Tag Archives: David Cameron

Churchill’s bounty

Inspired by David Cameron’s recent visit to Porthdinllaen, Tim Erasmus has written an interesting blog post on Prime Ministers who chose North Wales for their holidays.   I commend it to readers, if only for the insight it provides into the amorous adventures  of Herbert Asquith, a Prime Minister I had previously thought of as weak, indecisive and vacillating, and certainly no Lothario.

The post also includes a photo of a vacationing Churchill, who was himself a visitor to the area.

My late uncle, W O Jones, once told me of an encounter he had with Churchill and David Lloyd George at the Royal St David’s golf course in Harlech.

W O and a friend had applied to become members of the club, where it was the practice for probationers to make themselves available for caddying duty for several months before full membership could be conferred.

On the day in question, the two young men were waiting at the club when Lloyd George and Churchill turned up and accepted their offer to act as caddies.  W O carried Lloyd George’s clubs and his friend caddied for Churchill.

At the end of the round, each statesman pressed a coin in his caddy’s hand. W O was delighted to find that he had been tipped a half sovereign by L-G and then a little deflated to find that his friend had received a full sovereign from Churchill.

Both young men had done rather well, though.  This was before the First World War, when many a man of similar age could have lived for a week on Churchill’s bounty.

Loser’s charter

John Reid’s appearance with David Cameron on an anti-AV campaign platform yesterday has caused enormous outrage among certain elements of the party’s top brass.

John Denham, the shadow Business Secretary, and a long-time advocate of constitutional tinkering, was one of the most outspoken:

“First-past-the-post supports the dominant two parties and is unfair on the third party. In huge areas of southern England, Labour is the third party.

“The judgment of the Labour No campaign is wrong in principle on electoral reform and bad for the Labour Party politically. It doesn’t take into account the country’s electoral geography.”

Personally, I have never understood the argument that first-past-the-post is somehow unfair.  It is hard to think of a system fairer than one under which the candidate who secures the most votes actually wins.

However, Denham’s criticism that FPP is “unfair” on the third party is telling.   If you are in with a chance as one of the two top candidates, you are unlikely to complain too much about the current arrangements.  If, on the other hand, you know you don’t have a prayer, then you are all the more likely to want to gerrymander the system to make it possible to sneak in by the back door.

AV, put simply, is a loser’s charter.  But, fact is, if you’re afraid of losing, you really shouldn’t do politics.  I lost in two general elections when the Tory party was in the doldrums.  I never regretted a moment of either experience, accepting, as most politicians do, that if you live by the sword, you die by the sword. 

And more than 100 Labour MPs agree with me.