Category Archives: Liberal Democrats

Par for the course

Henley, by the way, must have been a bit of a disappointment for the Lib Dems, who had been heavily talking up their prospects, suggesting, in true Lib Dem style, that it was going to be a photo finish.

They made two big mistakes, however, by not selecting a local candidate and by mounting a vicious, personalised attack on John Howell, the Conservative victor.

I find it hard to understand how the Lib Dems have managed to cultivate for themselves, among certain sections of the electorate, the image of the middle-of-the-road, nice guys of British politics. They are, in fact, the very dirtiest of campaigners.

In 2003, their local government campaign manual, Effective Opposition, advised activists to “be wicked, act shamelessly, stir endlessly” and that “positive campaigning will not be enough to win control of the council”.

In the 2006 local elections, they got into more trouble when it was revealed that their updated election manual urged campaigners to persuade children to do their delivering for them by offering them sweets:

“You go into the middle of a council estate with your leaflets and you shout at all the local kids you can see and hear ‘any of you lot want to help deliver all these leaflets?’.

“Then proceed Pied Piper-like round the estate doling out badges and toffees and leaflets, the last at least to be pushed through doors by the shouting, squealing and quarrelsome horde.”

The Lib Dems’ conduct in Henley, therefore, should not be wondered at. It’s the way they do business.

Dead Parrot?

The latest opinion poll to be published – by BPIX for today’s Mail on Sunday – shows the Conservative party 23 points ahead of Labour. To the extent that it gives the Tories a commanding lead, it echoes most recent polls. It must be a deeply depressing piece of research from a Labour party perspective and is almost scarily encouraging for the Conservatives.

The poll uses a large sample of 2,385 respondents. According to politicalbetting.com, fieldwork was conducted online for BPIX by YouGov. Certainly, its conclusions mirror recent findings in YouGov branded polls, but there is also a degree of consistency with polls published by ICM, ComRes and Populus.

Bad news for Labour, certainly, and, if anything, even worse news personally for Gordon Brown, whose own approval ratings are almost laughably low. But arguably the poll’s most interesting finding is an astonishing slump in support for the Liberal Democrats, whose share is down to 14 per cent. This will undoubtedly cause raised eyebrows; politicalbetting.com points out that it is 7 per cent below what ICM last reported and 4 per cent below YouGov.

However, the BPIX findings on Lib Dem support should not be lightly dismissed. The poll follows close on the heels of the Crewe and Nantwich by-election, the principal significance of which was that disaffected Labour voters, for the first time in a by-election for 30 years, switched directly to the Conservatives and eschewed the Lib Dems, who in recent years had become the established repository for protest votes. The failure of the Lib Dems to profit from Labour’s unpopularity, and the success of the Conservatives in doing so, is one of the principal reasons that Crewe and Nantwich may be considered to mark a sea change in national politics.

If the BPIX findings were reproduced at a general election, Lib Dem representation in the Commons would be reduced to just 15 seats. They would be wiped out in many parts of the country, including their traditional heartland of the south-west. In Wales, they would hold only one seat, Cardiff Central.

The last three general elections, coinciding as they have with relatively low levels of support for the Conservative party, have seen the Lib Dems performing remarkably well. In 1997, 2001 and 2005, they won 46, 52 and 62 seats respectively.

However, when the Conservatives were doing well, in 1983, 1987 and 1992, the Lib Dems and their predecessors, the Liberal – SDP alliance, won significantly fewer seats: just 23, 22 and 20. And in 1979, when Margaret Thatcher won her first general election, the Liberals took only 11 seats.

Of course, in terms of reflecting Lib Dem support, this may indeed prove to be a rogue poll. On the other hand, it may reflect a generational shift in political sentiment and a return to former levels of support for the Lib Dems and their predecessors.

So keep a close eye on the next batch of opinion polls. It will be interesting to see whether they also suggest that the Lib Dem dove is indeed entering a downward spiral.

Or am I missing something?

An attempt by a Lib Dem Welsh Assembly member, Peter Black, to obtain powers for the Assembly to introduce a proportional representation system in council elections has been defeated.

The argument in favour of the proposal was summed up by the Lib Dem group leader, Mike German, in predictable Lib Dem fashion:

“Fundamentally, a proportional vote is all about fairness. It’s about making your vote count wherever you are.”

“Fairness” is, of course, the specious argument perennially advanced by the Liberals in favour of the shabby PR system ever since the penny finally dropped that they stand no chance of ever winning parliamentary power again on a first past the post basis.

Personally, I can’t think what can be fairer than an electoral system under which the candidate who gets the most votes actually wins.

Synthetic Anger from a Dead Parrot

A ludicrous, posturing display by the Lib Dems today, when, led by their foreign affairs spokesman, Ed Davey, they walked out of the chamber over the Speaker’s refusal to allow a debate on their amendment to the motion on the Treaty of Lisbon, calling for a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU.

The Lib Dems’ call for an “in-out” referendum is in truth nothing more than a smokescreen for their refusal to back Conservative demands for a referendum on the treaty itself. It is a spineless, cynical position rendered even more shameful by the ersatz outrage they displayed today. It was, as John Redwood put it, nothing more than synthetic anger.

I spoke to a Lib Dem MP shortly afterwards and suggested to him that the incident had done his party no good. He agreed with me.

“It was born out of desperation,” he said. “I swear I saw Ed Davey smiling as he left the chamber.”

Small wonder that people’s faith in politicians continues to wither.