Category Archives: Labour Party

Grateful thanks to Labour

My grateful thanks to my Labour opponent for securing me at least one more vote today.

After morning service in St Paul’s, I was approached by a retired lady who was clutching a copy of the Labour election address: a farrago of shameless lies about which I have blogged previously. 

“This says that the Tories intend to give a £200,000 tax cut to the 3,000 richest families,” she said.  “Is that true?”

I told her that the leaflet was referring to the Conservative proposal to increase the inheritance tax threshold to £1 million, which meant that nobody who was not a millionaire would ever have to pay the tax again.   Only the really rich would pay.

The lady was delighted.  She was certainly not a millionaire, but her estate was also certainly in the taxable bracket.  She was currently paying a substantial monthly insurance premium to provide for a fund that would pay the inheritance tax likely to be due on her death.

“That means I won’t have to pay the premiums any more if the Tories win,” she said.  “And quite right, too.  I’ve saved hard all my life and paid my taxes.  Why should my children pay more tax when I die?”

Apologising for troubling me with politics on the day of rest, she assured me of her support.

I’m not entirely sure that that was the outcome Labour intended, but my heartfelt thanks once again.

Labour rubbish

Bereft of any positive reasons to give electors as to why they should vote for Gordon Brown, Labour candidates, including my opponent in  Clwyd West, have resorted to scaring elderly people by telling lies about Conservative policy.

So let me assure constituents that we will not cut bus passes or winter fuel allowances or free TV licences.  We will preserve and protect them.

And if any Labour canvasser tries to tell you otherwise, inform him as plainly and pointedly as you can that he is a downright liar.

Back of the net

From yesterday’s Western Mail:

Reflecting on the first week of campaigning, Mr Hain said: “I think it has been a score-draw and now we are moving up a gear to start scoring shots in our opponents’ goals.”

Ignoring the spectacularly mixed metaphor, one must wonder in whose goals he thinks Labour have so far been scoring.

Perhaps he has the former candidate for Moray in mind?

Brown substance

Labour’s general election manifesto will be launched later today. It is heavily trailed in all the dailies and the Mirror even prints a picture of its front cover, which shows a family gazing at the sun rising over a green and pleasant land.

As might be expected, Labour’s pre-launch hype seeks to gloss over the not unimportant point that the party has been in power for the last thirteen years:

“The days of take it or leave it public services are over,” Brown says. “The days of just minimum standards are over. The days of the impersonal are finished. It has to be personal, accountable and tailored to your needs, and with a mechanism to trigger change if the service does not meet your needs.”

A reasonable reader might be inclined to ask why, if the Prime Minister is so determined to do away with “take it or leave it” services, he has presided over them for so long.  That, however, is not the issue.  The real issue, you see, is one of substance.

Yes, “substance” is a word that may be found spattered across today’s papers.  The manifesto is a “manifesto of substance” because the choice for electors is one between “Cameron style” and “Brown substance”.

I could make a joke about “Brown substance”, but, since I am not the former Labour candidate for Moray, I shall refrain.

By the way, I’m not entirely sure that the “sunrise” motif is one that Labour should be employing.  It merely serves to remind people that it is always darkest before the dawn.  And the darkness is one of Labour’s making.

Tweet with care

The press continually assure us that this will be the first-ever digital general election.  This is ever so slightly hyperbolic;  I remember that the internet figured heavily in the 2005 election and was not much less in evidence in 2001.

However, what is absolutely certain is that this will be the first-ever Twitter general election.  Twitter, which was launched in 2006 and is now hugely popular, will have the power to break election news and disseminate it instantly to a potentially enormous audience.  It will be a massively important medium for promoting political awareness. 

At the same time, Twitter will also have the power to damage or break political careers.  An injudicious tweet may come back to haunt the tweeter a thousand thousandfold.

In fact, it already has.  On the morning of 15 February, David Wright, the Labour MP for Telford and a Government whip, went on a bit of a tweeting binge, in the course of which he abused his political opponents in a particularly obnoxious manner.  All electronic hell broke loose about a seemingly startled Mr Wright, who attempted, vainly, to offer apologies.  Ultimately, he gave up the struggle and tweeted rather pathetically:

What a commotion today. Looks like my tweets have been tinkered with. I will keep you posted.

He never did; Mr Wright hasn’t ventured onto Twitter since, presumably fearful of what his reappearance might provoke.  He has, it would seem, tweeted his last.

Despite his embarrassment, however, Mr Wright’s career survived.  He was still serving in the Government whips’ office when Parliament was prorogued.  He is now seeking re-election in Telford, where I hope he will lose to my good friend Tom Biggins.  He is basically a nice chap who for some reason didn’t realise that Twitter should be treated by politicians much as they would handle a particularly unstable stick of gelignite.

One Labour politician who did not survive an ill-judged dalliance with Twitter, however, is Stuart MacLennan, the Labour Parliamentary candidate for Moray.  Mr MacLennan, in an astonishing burst of uncontrolled vulgarity, managed to malign in the most coarsely offensive terms possible the leaders of both the Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties, as well as the Speaker of the House of Commons, the Labour MP Dianne Abbot and the entire elderly population of Scotland.  He even succeeded in insulting a banana.

Yesterday, in a rare and commendable display of decisiveness, Gordon Brown clipped the errant tweeter’s wings.  Politically speaking, Mr MacLennan is no more.  Labour will have to find a new candidate for Moray pretty darn quickly.

Mr MacLennan’s Twitter site has also been culled; search for it and you will find only a bemused namesake: a Scottish disc jockey who yesterday expressed perplexity that his low-profile site had attracted 50 new followers in a day.  Perhaps he might like to consider standing for Labour in Moray and save them the cost of reprinting all those posters.  There again, probably he wouldn’t.

However, take a look at Google’s cache of the Labour MacLennan’s site and you will find an astonishingly prescient post; on 6 April, Mr MacLennan tweeted:

Iain Dale reckons the biggest gaffes will likely be made by candidates on Twitter – what are the odds it’ll be me?

I don’t know the answer to that, but I wish I’d made enquiries on Betfair.

As low as it gets

A good day’s canvassing in Glyn ward, Colwyn Bay today.  It seems pretty clear that the Labour vote is disintegrating.

I was, however, genuinely shocked when an elderly lady told me that she was concerned that the Conservative party will scrap free bus passes for retired people.  I told her that that was untrue and asked her where she had obtained the information.  She told me that she had been told by Labour activists.

All Labour campaigning to date has been negative – which I can accept because they have nothing positive to offer – but this is nothing short of disinformation.  It is a lie, aimed at upsetting vulnerable people.  Labour should be thoroughly ashamed.

Bring it on

The office TV set, which perennially displays the green screen of the Parliamentary annunciator, was this morning tuned instead to the BBC News channel and the somewhat anticlimactic drama of the announcement of the general election campaign.

Not that there weren’t some high spots:  the moment, for example, when the Prime Minister’s Jaguar swept through Trafalgar Square and the hovering helicopter picked up the “Vote for Change” placards held aloft by enterprising Tory activists.

The Tories stole a march on Labour, too, with David Cameron’s delivery of a live ten-minute address outside County Hall while Gordon was still occupied with marshalling his cabinet, who ultimately lined up behind him, politburo-fashion, in Downing Street.   They listened attentively, hands clasped in front of them like footballers prepared for a particularly vicious free kick, as the PM delivered a notably wooden, almost Stalinesque, pitch to the British people over an echoey sound connection.  Then they then trooped back inside behind him, assembled together in No 10 for perhaps the last time.

Throughout the day, below my window on College Green, the TV lights burned brightly as a parade of politicians and pundits submitted themselves to interrogation.  I watched sporadically throughout the day, until an almost surrealistic interview with an over-excited John Prescott (who is clearly gagging for a seat in the Lords) convinced me that I had had enough.

My Parliamentary office is now packed away in boxes.  The decks are cleared.  Tomorrow we will have the last PMQs of this Parliament and then it’s back to North Wales, the Land Rover, the walking shoes and the campaign trail.

We’re ready for it.  Bring it on.

Ashes victory

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

The Conservative party has now launched its own “Ashes to Ashes” campaign on exactly the same electronic poster sites as those used by Labour.

Losing the Ashes test

I can’t help feeling that Labour’s new poster campaign is unlikely to produce the effect desired by the party’s spin machine. 

It depicts David Cameron as DCI Gene Hunt from the BBC TV series Ashes to Ashes, with the caption “Don’t let him take Britain back to the 1980s” and will apparently go up on 1,000 electronic billboards across the country.

Labour’s problem is that the poster is targeted at the youth vote, which – self-evidently, one might have thought – doesn’t remember the 1980s.  What is does remember, however, is Ashes to Ashes, of which – despite his manifest political incorrectness – Hunt was the charismatic star character.

What’s more, showing Cameron perched casually on the bonnet of the iconic Audi Quattro, wearing a sharp suit and snakeskin boots, his tie insouciantly loosened, the poster arguably makes the Tory leader look pretty cool.

All in all, an image that may prove rather attractive to undecided yoof.

More, please.

The future’s fair; the future’s orange

 

Tuned in to Sky News this evening to be greeted by the astonishing sight of Tony Blair singing the praises of Gordon Brown.

Who’d have thought it, eh?  Three years after the not wholly bloodless coup that saw him ejected from Downing Street and his auld adversary installed in his stead, there was the maestro, back in the limelight, centre stage in the incongruous surroundings of Trimdon Labour club.

Not that he looked that much like the old Blair, mind.  The last three years have not been kind to him.  His hair had greyed and thinned and he was almost painfully gaunt, the expensive Savile Row suit hanging from his narrowed frame.  Most startlingly, he was orange.  Bright orange.  Tangerine.

But it was Blair, all right.  There was no mistaking the gulps, the blinks, the jerky gestures, the faux emotion of the halting delivery, or the idiosyncratic enunciation: “Britain acted” became “Britain actud”.  Yes, there he was: Tony Blair lauding Gordon to the rafters.

But will it do Labour any good?  Hard to say.  Blair was a big hitter, of course, and the most successful Labour leader in history.  He is still sprinkled with stardust.

There again, he brings with him a lot of bad vibes, too, the very worst being the memory of Iraq.

But what cannot be doubted is that Gordon Brown must be feeling pretty desperate to trot out Tony Blair at this stage of the game.  Brown has always been desperate to make his own mark, not to go down in history as just the man who came in on Tony Blair’s coat-tails, only to be blown away at the next general election. 

It must have hurt him deeply – really deeply – to authorise Blair’s intervention today.

Perfect union

A report in today’s Telegraph has the whiff of real scandal about it.

The paper has discovered that, over the past decade, Unite – the union that is now apparently doing its best to destroy British Airways – and the two unions of which it is the merged product, Amicus and TGWU, have received almost £18 million of taxpayers’ money.  During the same period, the Labour party has received over £29 million, or over 24 per cent of its revenue, from the three unions.

Over £17 million has been paid to the unions from the Union Learning Fund, established by the Government in 1998 to help train union representatives and members.   Funding for the scheme was increased shortly after Gordon Brown became Prime Minister in 2007.  However, Unite does not give details of how the money is applied and evaluation reports ceased to be published years ago.

In addition, Unite has received over £380,000 from the Union Modernisation Fund, administered by Lord Mandelson’s Business Department, which has the ostensible aim of helping trade unions improve their management structures.

Unite, therefore, has received a huge wodge of cash from the taxpayer without, extraordinarily enough, having to tell the taxpayer where a single penny of it has been spent.  What the taxpayer does know, however, is that:

  • Unite is the Labour party’s biggest donor;
  • its political director, Charlie Whelan, is now once again ensconced in Downing Street, where he is helping Peter Mandelson  mastermind Labour’s election campaign;
  • Jack Dromey, Unite’s deputy general secretary and Harriet Harman’s husband, has just been selected for the safe Labour seat of Birmingham Erdington from what was supposed to be an all-women shortlist;
  • 108 Labour MPs, or almost a third of the Parliamentary party,  are members of Unite.

On Wednesday, at PMQs, David Cameron suggested that the Labour party is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Unite.  It’s hard to disagree with that.

Today, Francis Maude, the shadow Cabinet Office minister, commented that the financial arrangement uncovered by the Telegraph “looks like money laundering – taxpayers’ money is being funnelled into Unite then put straight back into Labour’s coffers.”

On the face of it, it’s hard to disagree with that, too.

Fleecing the pensioners

Welsh Questions today, and I decided to piggy-back on a question on pensions tabled by Clwyd South’s Martyn Jones (for whom today was his swansong, as he is standing down at the general election):

Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): Many Welsh pensioners would now be enjoying a considerably more comfortable retirement if the then Chancellor, the current Prime Minister, had not decided in 1997 to abolish advance corporation tax credits for pension funds. Does the Secretary of State think, 13 years later, that that £100 billion raid on pension funds was right?

Mr. Hain: The truth is that pensioners are a great deal better off under this Labour Government. Pensioner households in Wales will be £1,500 better off this year, and the poorest third of pensioner households will be £2,100 better off. Why does the hon. Gentleman not stop his party, and its candidates and Members of Parliament, attacking policies such as free bus travel and free prescriptions for pensioners in Wales?

It is hardly surprising that Peter Hain refused to give a straight answer to the question.  Gordon Brown’s smash and grab treatment of the pension funds is probably one of the wickedest acts of this Government, damaging confidence in the British pensions system and rendering the retirements of hundreds of thousands of pensioners less secure. 

Labour should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves.

Whither Adonis?

High praise must go to the courage of the Transport Secretary, Lord Adonis, for his unequivocal criticism of the Unite union’s conduct over the BA strike.

Speaking on The Andrew Marr Show, Adonis said:

“The stakes are incredibly high. I absolutely deplore the strike;, it is not only the damage it is going to do to passengers and the inconvenience it’s going to cause — which is quite disproportionate to the issues at stake — but also the threat it poses to the future of one of our great companies in this country.

“It’s totally unjustified. I do call on the union to engage constructively with the company at this late stage.”

Contrast Adonis’s admirable plain speaking with the mealy-mouthed comments that have thus far come from Gordon Brown, who has merely said that “the disruption to services is unacceptable”.

Readers who have spent the last three years marooned on a remote desert island may wish to know that:

  • Charlie Whelan, Unite’s political director, is Gordon Brown’s former spin doctor;
  • it is widely anticipated that Whelan will have a central role in Labour’s general election campaign;
  • Labour has received up to 25 per cent of its funding from Unite since Gordon Brown became Prime Minister;
  • Unite’s deputy general secretary, Jack Dromey, was recently selected as parliamentary candidate for Birmingham Erdington.  Proposals that the selection should be made from an all-women shortlist were overruled by Labour’s National Executive Committee;
  • Mr Dromey is the husband of Labour’s deputy leader, Harriet Harman.

Sadly, I strongly suspect that Lord Adonis’s political career is unlikely to advance significantly further.

Roger’s secret

Yesterday, I wound up for the Opposition in the annual St David’s Day debate in the Commons.  The debate was opened by Peter Hain, who spent most of his time denigrating the Tories; he must be deeply worried, which pleases me greatly.

An intriguing moment came when the veteran Labour Member, Ann Clwyd (Cynon Valley), spoke about her early days in Parliament:

Ann Clwyd (Cynon Valley) (Lab): I first became an elected Member in 1979, when the hon. Member for Brecon and Radnorshire (Mr. Williams) was in Brecon and Radnorshire, which was in my European constituency. I hope that I do not embarrass him, but I was very grateful for his help at that time. We remain good friends, even though we are on opposite sides of the Chamber, and I hope that he might help me in other campaigns some time in the future.

Roger Williams, the MP for Brecon and Radnorshire, turned scarlet.

“Were you one of them, Roger?” asked Cheryl Gillan, but received no answer.

So was Roger a Labour supporter?  Perhaps a reader knows the answer.

Peter Hain should relax

A panicky-sounding Peter Hain is warning that Plaid Cymru could be contemplating dirty dealing after the election:

“Plaid could never form a government in Westminster, and all the signs emerging from their conference are that they would do a sordid deal with David Cameron.

“The Tories, propped up by Plaid, would be a change we in Wales cannot afford. The election this year will be a choice between a Labour government securing our economic recovery and jobs for Wales, or a Tory government putting everything at risk.”

Understandable anxiety, but I really do think that Peter ought to relax.

After all, most of  the sordid deals that Plaid have done to date have been with the Labour party.