Category Archives: health and safety

Big Brother Watch

Those of my readers who are concerned about the ever-advancing power of the state and its agencies (and there are, I can assure you, quite a few) could do worse than bookmark the Big Brother Watch website.

Big Brother Watch’s mission statement is as follows:

Big Brother Watch fights injustice and campaigns to protect our civil liberties and personal freedoms.

The British state has accumulated unprecedented power and the instinct of politicians and bureaucrats is to expand their power base even further into areas unknown in peace time.

Big Brother Watch campaigns to re-establish the balance of power between the state and individuals and families.

We look for the sly, slow seizure of control by the state – of power, of information and of our lives.

We advocate the return of our liberties and freedoms and look to ordinary people to join our cause. 

Regular readers will know that  this blog has long railed against the apparently unbridled proliferation of CCTV cameras, the heavy-handed actions of officious jobsworths, the insidious expansion of the national DNA database and, of course, the unstoppable rise of the healthansafety  industry.

I am therefore delighted at the formation of an organisation dedicated to exposing and countering these sinister and essentially New Labour trends in our society and am equally delighted to add a link to its website.

Healthansafety corner

Hanging basketSpecial congratulations are due to the Richmond Housing Partnership (RHP), a south-west London housing association, for its innovative development of healthansafety thinking.

RHP has banned its tenants from having hanging baskets, window boxes and pot plants on their porches and balconies, not because of the possibility that they might fall on someone’s head, but on the novel grounds that they constitute a fire risk.  Really.

And not only has RHP succeeded wonderfully in making its tenants’ lives considerably less pleasant, but it has also found an enterprising way of making money out of the exercise.  According to the Telegraph:

From now on, plant arrangements deemed to be a fire risk will be marked with a sticker which gives owners 24 hours to remove them before the housing association takes them away.

Once they are confiscated, their owners will have to pay a £25 charge to get them back.

I have to say that I was not previously aware of the incendiary properties of trailing lobelias, but clearly there was a serious and potentially calamitous gap in my knowledge. 

So, well done, Richmond Housing Partnership, bright new talent of the healthansafety industry!

And I am sure that, once they have got over the temporary pain of handing over their £25 for the return of their empty hanging baskets, its tenants will be immensely grateful for having such a caring, forward-thinking, responsible landlord.

Healthansafety corner

Good to see that the British healthansafety industry is continuing its onward march, undaunted by the challenges of the recession.

The BBC News website informs us that 10 schools a week are switching from knotted to clip-on ties:

The Schoolwear Association, the trade body for the school uniform industry, has been identifying this year’s trends.

The emergence of clip-on ties is part of a growing sensitivity towards health and safety, says the association, along with modifications such as high-visibility trimming on scarves.

Clip-on ties take away the risk of pupils having accidents with their knotted ties.

Schools have raised concerns about ties catching fire in science lessons, getting trapped in technology equipment or ties getting caught when pupils were running.

It is impossible to overstate the hazards inherent in the frivolous and quite unnecessary practice of tie-wearing; indeed, I am surprised and disappointed  that the Schoolwear Association hasn’t gone the whole hog and consigned the otiose bourgeois guttural adornment to the dustbin of sartorial history.  

Opting for a clip-on, frankly, is nothing more than a cop-out.

Biter bit

calendar1

Regular readers will know that I frequently tease the healthansafety industry in this blog, mostly to the approval of my readership, with the notable exception of Mark Tami, MP for Alyn and Deeside.

 I was therefore surprised and delighted to receive, in this morning’s post, a belated combined Christmas card and 2009 calendar from the Health and Safety Executive, the front cover of which is reproduced above.

I was very pleased to see that, contrary to popular opinion, the HSE do have a sense of humour.  I was a little less pleased when I impaled my index finger on the calendar’s spiral wire spine.

Healthansafety Corner

There may be Christmas carnage on the High Street as the downturn tightens its grip, mighty financial institutions may topple and motor manufacturers fall, but the all-conquering British healthansafety industry goes from strength to strength.

Yesterday, Ed Balls’s Department for Children, Schools and Families (surely the very apogee of New Labour departmental nomenclature) published its latest meisterwerk, ‘Tis the Season to be Careful. Produced in a jolly Advent calendar-style format, the leaflet warns of the hidden dangers attendant on the festive season. These include:

• people cutting themselves with knives while opening presents;
• children falling off rocking horses (rocking horses?);
• bikes smashing into walls;
• hot fat spilt on cooks grappling with the turkey;
• tipsy party guests crashing to the floor when they miss their seat at the table;
• children getting drunk on the dregs of wine left in adults’ glasses.

All good, sensible stuff, and full marks to the DCSF for pointing out these wholly unapparent yuletide hazards. An excellent application of public money, I think you’ll agree.

Rank Stupidity

Today’s Telegraph carries an extraordinary story (which must be true, because April Fool’s day is over a week away) about Bournemouth Borough Council, which has suspended 101 taxi drivers who refused to undergo a BTEC course in “Transporting Passengers By Taxi and Private Hire”.

The taxpayer-funded course requires, inter alia, that cabbies should learn how best to lift a suitcase (carry out a “risk assessment” by sizing up the shape of the load, the surrounding environment and their fitness level), how to greet passengers (“hello Mrs Smith, nice to see you again” or “good morning, how are you?” might be appropriate) and how to read body language (“body language”?). The recalcitrant drivers will be reinstated only if they complete the course and pass the exam within the next two months.

I like taxi drivers. I make a point of speaking to them whenever and wherever I am in a cab. They are invariably plain-speaking, sensible and forthright. They are also comprehensively endowed with common sense, which must in itself call into question the need for the qualification.

Speaking like a true cabbie, Frank Shaw, 67, who has driven a taxi in Bournemouth for 25 years, said:

“About 80 per cent of what you have to learn on this course is either completely ridiculous or just not relevant.

“I know how to greet a customer and lift a suitcase – I don’t need a piece of paper to prove that.

“The council has always been happy to give me a licence in the past and I have never had a complaint made against me.”

I had thought of putting this story in Healthansafety Corner, but decided against it, because it actually transcends healthansafety, combining, as it does, standard healthansafety nannying (how to lift a suitcase) with the new element of otiose hectoring (how to say “hello” to people).

It is, consequently, an exciting development, and Bournemouth council are to be warmly congratulated on being at the forefront of a pioneering new phase in this quintessentially British industry.

Healthansafety Corner

Today is Shrove Tuesday and should have been Pancake Race Day in Ripon.

However, this year’s traditional celebrations in the cathedral city have fallen flat because of “the amount of work needed to carry out risk assessments”.

The Dean of Ripon, the Very Rev Keith Jukes, told the Daily Telegraph:

“We have looked at this and there are a number of reasons why it won’t take place and a big reason this year is, sadly, health and safety.

“Any organisation that runs an event has to go through risk assessments. The insurance companies demand it and in the end you have to work out whether it’s a risk you take.”

My colleague, David Curry, MP for Skipton and Ripon, was so affronted by this latest triumph for the healthansafety industry that he raised it en passant at this morning’s session of the Planning Bill committee. I’m glad to say that there were murmurs of sympathy from both sides of the committee and the chairman, Barnsley’s Eric Illsley, muttered darkly that the Denby Dale pie would be next.

Healthansafety Corner

According to the schools inspectorate, health and safety concerns have contributed to a big decline in geography field trips, leading, in turn, to many students abandoning the subject altogether.

Reporting an 11 per cent decline in the number of students taking geography at A level, the Ofsted inspectors comment:

“The majority of the primary and secondary schools in the survey did not recognise the value of fieldwork sufficiently and did not fulfil the requirement to provide it. Concerns about health and safety, curriculum time, expertise and budgets reduced the amount and effectiveness of fieldwork.”

The report goes on to say that health and safety fears were so pronounced in some schools that head teachers had refused to allow pupils off site.

I have always considered travel to be probably the most mind-broadening exercise a child, or anyone else for that matter, can engage in. Geography may reasonably be said to be the academic expression of travel. Now, because of institutionalised paranoia, thousands of young people are being denied a life-enhancing experience.
Yet another triumph for the healthansafety industry.

Healthansafety Corner

I am very concerned indeed by this report on the BBC website that chief constable Richard Brunstrom tested the security of his own headquarters building, which is presently undergoing refurbishment, by scaling scaffolding and climbing in through a window.

According to the BBC:

“It is not known whether Mr Brunstrom was wearing any safety equipment as he climbed the scaffolding.

“It also remains unclear how many of the building’s four storeys he scaled.”

It seems to me, at first sight, that there may well have been a serious breach of health and safety legislation on the chief’s part. No doubt he will ensure that the appropriate enquiries are made.

Healthansafety Corner

Not even the festive season is safe from the excesses of the healthansafety industry.

According to today’s Telegraph, in a report that will no doubt warm the cockles of Mark Tami’s heart, panto performers in this year’s Babes in the Wood production at Gorleston Pavilion Theatre, near Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, have been banned from throwing sweets into the audience, for fear of being sued for negligence if a child is hit on the head.

Instead, “confectionery will now be dropped into the front row and passed around by ushers, ending the tradition of children catching the treats.”

No donkey derby and now no chance of catching a Curly-Wurly at the panto. What a dismal, joyless world we are creating for our children.

Healthansafety Corner

The tragedy of the death of Jordan Lyon, the 10 year-old boy who drowned while two police community support officers looked on, has highlighted once again the idiocy of health and safety over-regulation.
 
 According to today’s Sunday Times, emergency services are being told not to attempt to save drowning people.
 
 Yes, you read that correctly. Both the police and the fire service disclosed this weekend that their frontline staff are instructed not to enter the water “in case they put themselves in danger”. In the circumstances, the conduct of the police officer who dived into the water in an attempt to save Jordan “on his own volition and contrary to advice” is all the more commendable. We are told that he will not be disciplined for his disobedience. How gracious. 
 
 Less fortunate, however, was Tam Brown, a firefighter who saved a woman from drowning in the River Tay last March. He was later told that he could face disciplinary action.
 
 My friend Anne Widdecombe’s observation on this craziness is characteristically forthright and absolutely spot on:
“In the last decade we really have got so bogged down in the compensation culture and procedures and fear of being sued that we’ve lost sight of the bigger picture completely.
“It’s barmy; we’ve lost sight of what the emergency services are for. They are there to help people. I am quite emotionally angry about this.
Damn being a PCSO, what about being a human being?”
If Mark Tami still reads this blog, perhaps he’d care to comment.

Mark Tami – an Apology

I appear to have incurred the wrath of Alyn and Deeside Labour MP, Mark Tami, which, readers will understand, is a terrible thing. I must hasten to offer a suitable apology.

Enfield lad Mark is normally a placid enough cove, sitting with the Welsh contingent in the rearmost of the Labour back benches, and usually raising not a peep, save to utter the odd “hear, hear” when Gordon is at the despatch box. Hitherto, the only time he has stuck his head significantly above the parapet was in September of last year, at the time of the failed Brown putsch against Tony Blair, when Mark, along with a few fellow bag-carriers, resigned his position as PPS (in his case to “Red” Dawn Primarolo, then Paymaster-General).

As a reward for being marched up the hill, only to be marched down again, Mark was appointed an assistant whip by Gordon this summer, after he acceded to the Labour throne. Though unpaid, the position appeared to please Mark, who, one might have thought, would have then reverted to his customary docility.

Not so. It would appear that Mark has been reading my blog (for which I must feel duly flattered) and my posts about the follies of over-regulation and general healthansafety pottiness have raised his hackles beyond endurance, to the extent that he has written about me on the Welsh Labour party website.

According to Mark, I am an “extreme rightwinger”, who is attacking “our basic rights”.

Steady on, Mark. I have to admit I am a bit right of centre (the fact that I am a Conservative MP should have given you a clue), but I can’t say I have ever wanted to attack anyone’s “basic rights”. In fact, being a Tory, I am, on the whole, rather in favour of the rights of the individual and opposed to the overweening power of the state.

Nor have I ever, as you appear to be suggesting, sought to deny women “equal rights in the work place”. Indeed, I can’t see that any of my blog posts could ever be interpreted that way by anyone who is remotely fair-minded.

What I do feel, however, is that a lot of the regulations that have been imposed on us, year on year, by your government, are probably unnecessary. I feel that regulations should be regularly audited and, if they are of no real benefit, should be scrapped.

I must acknowledge, however, that as a Brownite socialist, you probably don’t agree with me. Indeed, you probably applaud yesterday’s announcement that the requirement to provide Home Information Packs is to be extended to the sale of all three-bedroomed houses from September. I happen to believe that this piece of legislation is pointless, amounting to an additional tax on house selling, and may very well damage the housing market. You, on the other hand, no doubt feel that it is a jolly good idea. That is part of the reason you are a socialist. You like regulations. You like the idea of the government bossing people about. As a Conservative, I don’t.

Anyway, I do hope that this little disagreement won’t spoil the excellent relationship you and I have enjoyed until now. I am truly sorry to have upset you by saying that we have probably got too many regulations in this country. In future, I will try to keep my opinions to myself, so that you can go about the important business, undistracted, of whipping your colleagues on a pro bono basis.

Bright Idea

The office I share at Westminster with my colleagues Stephen Crabb, David Davies and Daniel Kawczynski is in St. Stephen’s Tower, one of the oldest parts of the Palace. It has many advantages: it is close enough to the lobbies to ensure that I can vote quickly after a division is called; it is spacious and comfortable and it has wonderful views of Westminster Abbey and the Victoria Tower. On the whole, I like it very much.

It does, however, have a couple of downsides. First, it can be very noisy, particularly when all of us are talking on the telephone or dictating. It is also rather dark, which makes it important that all the lights are working properly.

Every week or so, all the offices in the House are inspected by an efficient man with a clipboard, to make sure that the fixtures and fittings are in tip-top condition. A couple of weeks before the recess began, he called when I was working at my desk and asked if everything was in order. I pointed out that one of the lightbulbs in the central light fitting had blown and needed to be replaced. He said he would see to it.

Good as his word, he returned the following day with a couple of maintenance men. There was some discussion, after which he told me that the bulb could not be replaced immediately. The ceiling was marginally too high for them to use a stepladder; they would have to erect scaffolding over the weekend.

“Health and safety, you see, sir,” he said, almost apologetically, noting my quizzical look. I might have expected it.

I have already blogged about the healthansafety fascism which is making life in this country increasingly difficult. Last month, it put paid to the Llandudno donkey derby, but other examples of its excesses are legion. Healthansafety is making the convenient living of one’s day-to-day life increasingly difficult. It has engendered paranoia on a national scale, fuelled by claims farmers and aggressive lawyers. In short, it has made Britain a considerably less pleasant place to be.

As may be gathered from the foregoing rant, I feel very strongly about this issue. I was consequently delighted by reports in today’s Sunday Telegraph that John Redwood’s economic competitiveness policy group, due to report this week, is likely to recommend, inter alia, a thoroughgoing review of the Health and Safety at Work Act.

There have been immediate and predictable howls of outrage from the left. A spokesman for the TUC said that “plans to repeal the 1974 Health and Safety at Work Act go further than any plans Margaret Thatcher had to reduce protection at work” – a remarkable comment, given that the plans have not yet been published.

All nonsense, of course. A proposal to review the legislation does not amount to a suggestion that employers should be relieved of their obligation to provide a safe system of work. There will still, no doubt, be gainful employment for the Health and Safety Executive.

What a review will provide, however, is the opportunity to scrutinise the effects of the bewildering plethora of rules and regulations that have been grafted onto the 1974 legislation in the intervening years. A lot of those regulations emanate from Europe, but many of them have been gold-plated here in the UK. My suspicion is that a large percentage of them will not stand up to scrutiny and will, I hope, be scrapped.

The policy proposal will, I am sure, be widely welcomed. It will be welcomed by business, for which the the burden of unnecessary regulation amounts to a significant, sometimes unsupportable, overhead. It will be welcomed by public sector administrators, who spend an unconscionable proportion of their productive time carrying out risk assessments. Most importantly, it will be welcomed by the British public, sick to death of the bossy hectoring of the healthansafety industry and longing for a return to the days when children, rather than toy orang-utans, could happily participate in a donkey derby.

SnowBalls

Last week, Ed Balls, Secretary of State at the newly-named Department for Children, Schools and Families, said something which, remarkably enough, smacked of common sense.

Mr Balls, Gordon Brown’s Mini-Me, used to write speeches for the Prime Minister when he was shadow Chancellor. It was he who introduced the expression “post neo-classical endogenous growth theory” into a particularly turgid Broon monologue, which Michael Heseltine memorably dubbed “not Brown’s but Balls”.

Anyway, last week Balls tried a different tack and said something sensible. He said that childhood should be a “time for learning and exploring” and children should get the chance to play outdoors.

“My assumption is that, if it snows, kids go out and build snowmen and have snowball fights, that in October kids go out and play conkers, that they play marbles,” he declared.

Absolutely spot on, except that, in my experience, the best conkers usually had been picked, pickled and smashed by the end of September.

The point that Balls was trying to make is that these days, children don’t get out enough. Schools and clubs are afraid of letting them engage in the rough-and-tumble games of yore for fear of being sued. Health and safety (invariably elided into “healthansafety”) considerations have made us do our best to turn our offspring into a generation of wimps.

This depressing trend achieved its nadir yesterday in Llandudno. Every July for 39 years, a donkey derby has been held on Bodafon Fields. For almost two generations, children have got on the backs of donkeys, bounced about for a bit as their steeds charge down the course, have sometimes – fairly often, actually – fallen off and have generally had a beltingly good time.

God knows that this summer has been dire enough, so one might have hoped that this year’s derby would inject a little jollity into the otherwise unremitting gloom. Not so. The derby became the latest victim of healthansafety fascism.

The organisers, Llandudno Rugby club, were told that they couldn’t allow children to ride donkeys at a gallop. They couldn’t get insurance because of healthansafety. The insurers had been prevailed upon to offer a reluctant indemnity, but only if the donkeys were moving at walking pace and the riders were holding their parents’ hands. Anything more boisterous, and the club was on its own, at the mercy of Messrs Sue, Grabbit and Runne.

So the club had to call the derby off. As a protest, its members strapped cuddly toys to the donkeys’ backs and sent them careering across Bodafon Fields. None of the toys was hurt. An orange orang-utan apparently won. The watching kids were well and truly hacked off.

So Balls is right. Children are being deprived of the fun and excitement they deserve – no, need – at their time of life. Healthansafety has gone much, much too far.

But whose fault is it? Whose government has allowed the claims farmers to thrive and the compensation culture to flourish? Under whose watch did it become the case that you can’t turn on your radio without being assailed by ads from ambulance chasing “lawyers” urging us to pursue all and sundry through the courts, because, you see, where there’s blame there’s a claim?

It is Labour who have allowed this wretched state of affairs to develop, doing nothing to curb the compensationitis that is making us all frightened of our own shadows and terrified of being sued.

That Balls appears, belatedly, to have recognised this is welcome. Let him now issue an instruction to all teachers, next time it starts snowing, to send their charges straight outside into the cold and frosty air and let them slip, slide and snowball one another silly.