Monthly Archives: October 2010

Llwch

As regular readers will know, we moved house in June.  Since then, we have entertained a succession of electricians, carpenters, plumbers and decorators.  All of them have carried out their work excellently and have been a pleasure to have around us.

It has, as I predicted, been a long haul.  But now it’s nearing its end and we are starting to feel some satisfaction at having restored our 1930s house – reputed, possibly apocryphally, to have briefly been the home of no less an eminence than Sir Roger Moore around the time of his Ivanhoe incarnation – to something that we hope approaches the condition of its art deco heyday.

The pall of dust that permeated our new home for much of the first three months after we started the restoration has now abated.  It has not quite disappeared: it stubbornly, mysteriously continues to settle on polished surfaces out of apparently clear air within minutes of the application of the duster.  But Sara no longer wonders quite so frequently or quite so plaintively if she will ever see the end of the persistent, hated, all-pervading llwch.  In short, it’s getting better.

So much better, in fact, that we have begun to move our furniture back in. And once we’ve moved it in, we move it around.  And look at it.  And then move it again.   And so it will continue until we get it right or alternatively accept that we never will.

And we’ve had to buy stuff, too.  The kettle, which had functioned with quiet, unfailingly efficiency in our old home, found the move too traumatic and gave up the ghost within seconds of being placed on the kitchen counters of our new house.  It was all too much for it.

And so it was with the toaster.  And the coffee machine. The sea air apparently didn’t suit any of them.  So we’ve had to replace them all.

And today, we went out to buy a rug.  Not that we really had to.  The old fireside rug hadn’t surrendered, like the kettle.  Having no moving parts or electrical connections, it was made of sterner stuff.  But, fact is, it looked wrong.  It was primarily a cheerful, bright red in colour and just what was needed to brighten the long winter evenings in our beloved old former home, which, being a converted Victorian coach house, enjoyed somewhat subdued daylight.  But here it was trying too hard.  We needed something a bit less strident.

So we decided to replace it and made the journey to the enormous rug warehouse fifteen minutes down the A55, a place of pilgrimage on similar occasions throughout our marriage.

And believe me, it really is enormous.  Pile after pile, several feet high, of the exquisite woollen output of far-flung China, Iran, Pakistan and Turkey.  We were greeted by a particularly helpful and erudite lady, who lovingly directed our attention to the finer points of each rug, from the silken workings of an impossibly expensive offering from India to the yak hair woven by hand into a particularly striking piece from Tibet.  She knew a lot about rugs and was anxious to share her knowledge with us.

It was all terribly confusing, so we made our way to a heap of rugs of approximately the size and colour we were looking for.  The nice lady followed us.

“Wait a minute,” she called.  “I’ll just get one of the staff to help me fold the rugs back as you look at them.”

I begged her not to trouble herself; I would be quite happy to do it.

She looked at me kindly, but firmly replied: “I’m sorry but you can’t do that; health and safety, you see.”

Ah yes, of course. Health and safety.  My willingness to risk both and take my chances with the floor coverings was of no account.  The maxim volenti non fit injuria has clearly gone the way of our old kettle.

But ultimately we bought a rug and took it home and laid it in front of the fire, which we then lit, because autumn is here and there’s now a chill in the air.

And two more weeks should see it all finished.  Our friends will leave us for work elsewhere.  We will finish rearranging our furniture.  Peace, I hope, will reassert itself. 

We’re soon to have our own home to ourselves again.  And, pray God, there will be no more llwch.

Westminster overhears

“The first day I  arrived in Parliament, I sat down to dinner and soon discovered that I was the only one on the table whose grandfather hadn’t been a Prime Minister.”

Miliband should listen to Campbell

Wise words for Ed Miliband from Alastair Campbell today.

Speaking at the Cheltenham Literature Festival, Tony Blair’s former director of communications pointed out that the current Labour stance of simply criticising Government plans for spending reductions, without putting forward any cogent alternative proposals, just won’t wash:

“He’s only just been elected, but I think when the cuts do start to kick in – providing we have got a proper economic narrative – [it] isn’t just about saying ‘we’re against the cuts’.

“It is actually about how you build growth and how you develop a strategy for the future.”

There is some cause to believe that Miliband may be minded to heed Campbell’s advice.  His newly-appointed shadow Chancellor, Alan Johnson, has signalled that he will take Alistair Darling’s proposals to halve the deficit within a Parliament – effectively a cut of £44 billion – as a “starting point”.  Less ambitious than coalition proposals, certainly, but considerably more realistic than anything proposed by Ed Balls, who Miliband might easily have appointed to the shadow portfolio.

Labour are, after all, Her Majesty’s Opposition.  A position of ostrich-like denial is both demeaning of their constitutional function and insulting of the electorate. 

Hain again

I must admit to being quietly pleased at the re-appointment of Peter Hain as shadow Welsh Secretary, much as one enjoys the experience of being reunited with a mislaid pair of comfortable, well-worn shoes.

Given, too, that he was Secretary of State for so long, he will be able to continue to offer the House a valuable insight into why it was that, on his watch, Wales became and remained the poorest part of the United Kingdom.

Welcome back, Peter.

Too many Welsh

The British Secretary of State for Wales and S...

Image via Wikipedia

The shadow cabinet election results, declared yesterday evening, have attracted much comment in Wales.  Eight Welsh MPs, all of them former ministers, three of them Privy Councillors and two of them  former cabinet members, stood for election, yet none was successful.

Asked to explain this on BBC Wales news, David Hanson, the MP for Delyn, opined that “there were far too many Welsh MPs standing for election, and that split the Welsh vote.”

He was echoed, almost word for word, on Newsnight by the former Welsh Secretary, Peter Hain.

To an outsider, this is a perplexing point of view, but one that gives an interesting insight into the tribal nature of Labour politics.

Precisely what would have been the right number of Welsh candidates?  Do Welsh Labour MPs have to vote for at least one Welsh candidate?  How many Welsh candidates would a Scottish or English Member feel comfortable supporting? 

And why, if they were of sufficient calibre, should not all the Welsh candidates have been elected?  It’s all very baffling to an outsider.

However, there is some cause for hope in Welsh Labour ranks.  In an announcement redolent of Carroll’s caucus race, Ed Miliband has confirmed that his shadow cabinet will indeed contain a Welsh member, despite none having been elected. 

Cause also for optimism, surely, on the part of Peter Hain, who was one of the first to declare his support for Miliband Minor’s candidacy.