Monthly Archives: February 2010

Welsh Labour in denial

Welsh First Minister Carwyn Jones appeared on the Andrew Marr Show this morning.

When it was put to him by Marr, quite correctly, that Wales was more badly affected by the recession than any other part of the country, Jones pooh-poohed the criticism, saying that “the figures were not that bad”.

Actually, the figures are very bad indeed; Wales is the poorest part of the UK and it would have been better for Mr Jones to own up to it and say what he proposes to do about it. 

It would appear, however, that, like Peter Hain, Mr Jones is another Labour politician who believes that so long as Wales is doing better than Rwanda, everything in the garden is rosy.

Hain’s Rwanda moment

For those of you who missed it, here is Peter Hain’s Rwanda moment (also featuring fellow Welsh blogger, David Cornock):

Moshtarak

The men of the 1st Battalion, The Royal Welsh (The Royal Welch Fusiliers), to whom I paid a visit last September, are today playing a central role in Operation Moshtarak, which is aimed at clearing the Taliban out of central Helmand.

Our prayers should be for their safety and for the success of their important mission.

Foot in mouth disease

Just what is happening to the Labour front bench? 

Hard on the heels of Peter Hain’s “Rwanda” gaffe comes another gem from Housing Minister John Healey, usually a safe pair of hands and regarded by many as the most competent minister outside the cabinet.

Asked on Radio 5 Live why there were so many house repossessions despite Government support schemes, Healey replied:

“In some cases there is no way round that and in some cases it is the best thing for the people who are struggling with these mortgages.”

Given that the principal function of housing ministers is to ensure that as many people as possible actually have houses, it is hardly surprising that Healey’s comments have attracted a considerable degree of press attention.

And if you think I’m indulging in unseemly gloating, let me assure you that I’m not.  Foot-in-mouthitis is a condition that afflicts most politicians from time to time, particularly in the run-up to a general election.  And none of us, sadly, is immune.  It could well be my turn next.

A really good idea

Sitting in Euston station waiting for the train back to North Wales, I notice a book, apparently discarded.  On its cover is a peel-off label reading:

TRAVELLING BOOK

I’m not lost – I’m on a journey!

Pick me up, read and release me!

The label refers me to a website, www.bookcrossing.com.  There, I discover that:

BookCrossing is earth-friendly, and gives you a way to share your books, clear your shelves, and conserve precious resources at the same time. Through our own unique method of recycling reads, BookCrossers give life to books. A book registered on BookCrossing is ready for adventure.

Leave it on a park bench, a coffee shop, at a hotel on vacation. Share it with a friend or tuck it onto a bookshelf at the gym — anywhere it might find a new reader! What happens next is up to fate, and we never know where our books might travel. Track the book’s journey around the world as it is passed on from person to person.

I think that this is a tremendous idea.  I’ve signed up.

Cwm Rwanda?

Welsh Questions today witnessed a spectacular stumble by the normally sure-footed Peter Hain:

Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): Given that recently published figures show that economic inactivity in Wales is worse than in any other part of the UK, that three Welsh local authority areas are among the five poorest in the country, and that Wales has the highest rate of severe child poverty of all the home nations, what did the Secretary of State have in mind when he boasted last week that

“Wales is still a wealthy country”?

Complacent or what?

Mr. Hain: Does the hon. Gentleman not agree that, compared with Rwanda and most countries in the rest of the world—this is the point that I was making, if he had not chosen to take that quotation out of context—Wales is indeed still a wealthy country? Yes, we have suffered setbacks in the past few years, but we suffered terrible setbacks in the ’80s and ’90s. One of the reasons why we are in a strong position is that we have moved forward with investment to support businesses and the economy. That is one of the reasons why the number on incapacity benefit in Wales has come down by more than a fifth, when under the Conservatives it rose year on year.

Well, yes, I’m sure Wales is doing very nicely compared with Rwanda, which, according to the CIA World Factbook (excellent reference source, despite its spooky title) is:

a poor rural country with about 85% of the population engaged in (mainly subsistence) agriculture and some mineral and agro-processing… The 1994 genocide decimated Rwanda’s fragile economic base, severely impoverished the population, particularly women, and temporarily stalled the country’s ability to attract private and external investment… a majority still live below the poverty line of 250 Rwandan francs per day (about US$0.43)… Rwanda continues to receive substantial aid money and obtained IMF-World Bank Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) initiative debt relief in 2005-06.

On the other hand, I’m not entirely certain that the people of Wales would be wholly comfortable in the knowledge that their Secretary of State regards the landlocked African country as an appropriate benchmark for gauging their economic progress.

O’Brien is wrong; Terry deserved to be sacked

Mike O’Brien, Minister of State at the Department of Health, has decided to enter the debate over the sacking of John Terry as captain of the England football team.  Unfortunately, Mike has chosen to do so using the arguably inappropriate medium of Twitter, which, since it confines posts to a maximum of 140 characters, affords little opportunity for the development of reasoned debate.

Nevertheless, Mike, who is a highly intelligent lawyer, has apparently decided that his opinion on such a controversial moral issue can be satisfactorily encapsulated in fewer letters than those that appear on an HP sauce label, so here’s what he has to say:

The sacking of Terry is crass. Capello has bowed to tabloid pressure. Infidelity is bad but I saw no signs of fatigue in his football.

Sadly, Mike is missing the point, which is unfortunate, given that the whole point of Twitter is to be TO the point.  Terry has not been booted out of the England team (though many would say he should have been); he will, it would appear, still be gracing the turf of Wembley with his unfatigued presence, three lions emblazoned on his left breast.

No, Capello has dismissed Terry as captain of his country’s national side.  And Signor Capello was entirely right.

The captaincy of any national sporting side brings with it considerably more responsibility than that which comes with simply playing for it.  You become an ambassador for your country. You become, to use the hackneyed phrase, a role model.  Kids look up to you and aspire to be like you.  It’s a very heavy thing.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, has lamented that Terry’s treatment by the media has, if anything, been far too lenient.  It is, he says, a matter of regret that “society has lost the sacred concept of faithfulness on staying true to one another during marriage”:

“Clearly, a lot of people think there’s no problem there and that’s a pity because adultery is adultery.”

Dr Williams is absolutely right, too.  Time was, for example, when adultery was a resigning issue for politicians.  Many would say it still ought to be, but that principle appears to have been watered down of late. We must await the next scandal to see what happens.

The irony of the Terry affair is that it should take an Italian to recognise that adultery should automatically disqualify an Englishman from leading his national side.

Capello, who once played for Rome, understands that, like Caesar’s wife, the captain of England should be above suspicion.

PMQs

A very lively Prime Minister’s Questions, with Gordon Brown on the ropes over his Damascene conversion to the AV voting system, as David Cameron put it, thirteen years into this Government and ninety days out from a general election.

Cameron and other Members also tackled the Prime Minister on the evidence given by the former Chief of the Defence Staff, Lord Walker, to the Chilcot inquiry that service chiefs had threatened to resign en masse because of cuts in defence spending.

“They’re all Tories,” yelled Chris Ruane (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) helpfully.

Good news for Birmingham

Great news for the people of Britain’s second city.  Erdington MP, Siôn Simon, has announced that he is to stand down at the general election, to concentrate on becoming Birmingham’s first elected mayor.

By way of assistance to Mr Simon, and to give people a taste of what they might expect from their wannabe next first citizen, here’s a clip of him displaying to fullest advantage his unique range of talents:

A bit of a foul-up

There was an unexpected interlude of hilarity yesterday in the otherwise dry-as-dust Work and Pensions Questions, which customarily takes the form of a litany of statistics, each of them grim and each of them concealing hundreds of thousands of untold individual miseries.

The senior Conservative, David Heathcoat-Amory, rose to his feet to ask the Secretary of State:

Mr. David Heathcoat-Amory (Wells) (Con): If she will estimate the total pension deficit liability in the public sector.   

A look of perplexity, followed by panic, crossed the faces of the five members of the ministerial team.  Nobody had the answer. Then Angela Eagle, who glories in the title of Minister for Pensions and the Ageing Society, and who had clearly been given the short straw by Yvette Cooper, rose and approached the dispatch box tentatively, as if it was an elaborately carved, brassbound form of improvised explosive device:

Angela Eagle: We have been told that this question has been transferred to Her Majesty’s Treasury.

Speaker Bercow, however, would have none of it:

Mr. Speaker: Order. Let me say to the hon. Lady that the House was certainly not aware of that. I was not aware of it, the question is on the Order Paper, and I know that she will offer us an answer.

Ms Eagle knew she was stuck with it and had to make the best of a bad job.  She paused, drew a deep breath, and ploughed on with her answer:

Angela Eagle: I am happy to offer an answer. The total pension deficit liability in the public sector is, off the top of my head, close to £600-odd billion, but this has to be seen in context. The pension liabilities are calculated over the next 80 years. In that context, it has to be borne in mind that the average size of a public sector pension is £4,000 to £5,000.

Mr. Speaker: So there is time for an update.

David Heathcoat-Amory could hardly contain his amusement:

Mr. Heathcoat-Amory: It is obvious that the Government do not have a clue. They cannot even find a Department to answer the question, so let me provide the answer. Outside agencies estimate that the public sector deficit liability is about £1 trillion, which is £1,000 billion. In the pre-Budget report, the Government were going to get that down by only £1 billion, which is one tenth of 1 per cent. Is it not obvious that in this area of policy and many others we need a change of Government to get the answers?

Ms Eagle knew that she had made a chump of herself; there was no saving the situation, so she decided that attack was the only option available to her:

Angela Eagle: The right hon. Gentleman persists in scaremongering about the provision of public sector pensions for millions of low-paid public sector workers. As I have said, the average pension payment is £5,000 a year. Those liabilities are perfectly sustainable and comprise between 1.5 and 2 per cent. of GDP. If the right hon. Gentleman is telling the House that the Opposition do not think that that is sustainable, what he is saying to the electorate in the forthcoming election is that they will take away the public sector pension provision of millions of public sector workers who are out there working hard to keep our public services going in difficult times—and that, Mr. Speaker, is an absolute disgrace.

But she knew she had blown it and that, furthermore, she had been offered up by her four colleagues to take the elegantly-delivered kicking from Mr Heathcoat-Amory.

With a look approaching fury, she turned to her officials sitting in the box behind the Speaker’s chair and mouthed venomously: “That was a complete foul-up”.

At least, I think she said “foul-up”.  The “f” was clear enough.