<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The old tricks don&#8217;t work now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidjonesblog.com/2010/01/30/the-old-tricks-dont-work-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidjonesblog.com/2010/01/30/the-old-tricks-dont-work-now/</link>
	<description>Conservative Member of Parliament for Clwyd West</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:04:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Banks</title>
		<link>http://davidjonesblog.com/2010/01/30/the-old-tricks-dont-work-now/#comment-2994</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Banks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidjonesblog.com/?p=4576#comment-2994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;d better hope they still work, David, because your leader has carbon-copied them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;d better hope they still work, David, because your leader has carbon-copied them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Slocombe</title>
		<link>http://davidjonesblog.com/2010/01/30/the-old-tricks-dont-work-now/#comment-2990</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monty Slocombe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 12:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidjonesblog.com/?p=4576#comment-2990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anonymous (above) is right.   We have no conviction polititians now of the calibre, individuality and honesty of Thatcher or Churchill to rally the passions of the ordinary voter.   At least Blair had the conviction to remove the heart of Labour (Clause 4) before mesmerizing disillusioned Conservative voters to support him.

Removing Clause 4 was as dishonest as the implantation of false evidence re W.M.D., but he made them both work with the assistance of spin.   What we need now is some HONEST conviction, which I do not see in Mr. Cameron.   A hung parliament will be a nightmare for this poor country.   The troops need rallying with some basic home truths.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous (above) is right.   We have no conviction polititians now of the calibre, individuality and honesty of Thatcher or Churchill to rally the passions of the ordinary voter.   At least Blair had the conviction to remove the heart of Labour (Clause 4) before mesmerizing disillusioned Conservative voters to support him.</p>
<p>Removing Clause 4 was as dishonest as the implantation of false evidence re W.M.D., but he made them both work with the assistance of spin.   What we need now is some HONEST conviction, which I do not see in Mr. Cameron.   A hung parliament will be a nightmare for this poor country.   The troops need rallying with some basic home truths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everyones Favourite Comrade</title>
		<link>http://davidjonesblog.com/2010/01/30/the-old-tricks-dont-work-now/#comment-2989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Everyones Favourite Comrade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 00:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidjonesblog.com/?p=4576#comment-2989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Didn&#039;t the tories in 2003 and right up to the current point fully support the invasion and current occupation of Iraq?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t the tories in 2003 and right up to the current point fully support the invasion and current occupation of Iraq?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://davidjonesblog.com/2010/01/30/the-old-tricks-dont-work-now/#comment-2988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidjonesblog.com/?p=4576#comment-2988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He would still have the ability of making Labour a more electable party than Brown.
He would also still give Cameron a run for his money, I say this not as a Labour person, but as a Conservative.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He would still have the ability of making Labour a more electable party than Brown.<br />
He would also still give Cameron a run for his money, I say this not as a Labour person, but as a Conservative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty Slocombe</title>
		<link>http://davidjonesblog.com/2010/01/30/the-old-tricks-dont-work-now/#comment-2987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monty Slocombe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 09:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidjonesblog.com/?p=4576#comment-2987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why was this enquiry not conducted in the manner of a court hearing whereby witnesses would not know what previous witnesses have said?   Blair, a clever lawyer, has the benefit of all previous evidence to present his case, making New Labour appear united, and putting the best possible face on what we now know was illegal agression and occupation on another state for which we are all paying, thousands with their lives?   Will it be another whitewash?

The only thing he is saying which carries any semblance of conviction is that he really believed it was the right thing to do.   Does this amount to criminal intent?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was this enquiry not conducted in the manner of a court hearing whereby witnesses would not know what previous witnesses have said?   Blair, a clever lawyer, has the benefit of all previous evidence to present his case, making New Labour appear united, and putting the best possible face on what we now know was illegal agression and occupation on another state for which we are all paying, thousands with their lives?   Will it be another whitewash?</p>
<p>The only thing he is saying which carries any semblance of conviction is that he really believed it was the right thing to do.   Does this amount to criminal intent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

