Monthly Archives: November 2009

Make it pay to go green

A survey for BBC Wales reveals that nine in ten (93%) Welsh people believe that the world’s climate is changing and three in four (72%) think that the lead to combat climate change should come from the Government, even if it means using the law to change people’s behaviour.

Of course, using the law to change behaviour can mean carrot as well as stick.  One respondent to the BBC set out his suggestions:

“The Council could do more with your poll tax: if you recycle 50% of your waste, you get 20% discount on your poll tax. Something like that would motivate everyone.”

He is, of course, absolutely right.  Last week, George Osborne unveiled Conservative plans to encourage people to recycle more by actually paying them to do so:

In a speech just over a year ago, I mentioned a company called Recyclebank, which had successfully increased recycling rates by up to 200% in 500 cities and communities across America.

They had achieved this by paying the public to recycle – without the need for any extra government spending.

The reason they could do this is that in America, just as in the UK, local councils have to pay landfill tax for every tonne of waste they fail to recycle.

And what companies like RecycleBank do is say to councils and city administrations: if we reduce your landfill tax bill by pushing up recycling rates, then how about we split the savings?

Recyclebank then use this money to pay households up to £20 a month for their recycling.

And the more they recycle, the more they get paid.

Windsor and Maidenhead council have already trialled a similar scheme and have found that recycling rates have increased by as much as 30 per cent.

As George said, carrots usually work better than sticks.  It is a pity, therefore, that the Welsh Assembly Government has decided to penalise people for using new supermarket carrier bags rather than encouraging them to reuse old ones. 

Companies such as Tesco already offer “green” loyalty points to customers who provide their own carrier bags.  If WAG had a bit more imagination, it could surely come up with a scheme that encourages customers to reuse bags and rewards them for doing so, rather than resorting to the old socialist model of hammering them financially.

Haute cuisine

From today’s Sunday Times:

Scientists have grown meat in the laboratory for the first time. Experts in Holland used cells from a live pig to replicate growth in a Petri dish.

The advent of so-called “in-vitro” or cultured meat could reduce the billions of tons of greenhouse gases emitted each year by farm animals — if people are willing to eat it.

So far the scientists have not tasted it, but they believe the breakthrough could lead to sausages and other processed products being made from laboratory meat in as little as five years’ time.

I’m sure those “scientists” mean well, but I, for one, would rather turn vegetarian than introduce such ghastly, Frankenstein ordure into my digestive system.

If, of course, in the brave new world that awaits us, it will be still possible to find fresh vegetables that have not been genetically modified with bits of octopus, jellyfish or whatever.

A horse called Eurgain

To Rhos on Sea and the launch of my friend Graham Roberts’s new book Colwyn Bay through Time.

Graham is a noted local historian and his well-researched book of photographs is a sheer delight, showing what a very prosperous and elegant town Colwyn Bay was in the 19th and early 20th centuries and what it could be once again if the European strategic regeneration money is wisely spent.

My favourite of all the illustrations appears on page 36.  It shows a confident and impeccably turned-out gentleman named Jack Jones sitting on his horse, the equally well turned-out and wonderfully named Eurgain, at the bottom of Coed Pella Road sometime around the turn of the 20th century.  A photo below shows the same location in more recent times, with a troop of WRVS volunteers marching past the less than lovely edifice housing the Jobcentre that now occupies the site to the east of the entrance to the road.

If you are a resident of Colwyn Bay or a lover of the town, I thoroughly recommend Graham’s book.  It would make a wonderful Christmas present and can be purchased here.

And no, I’m not on a commission.

International dominoes

The news yesterday that the state-controlled Dubai World Corporation may be unable to meet its interest commitments has had enormous repercussions.  The FTSE sustained its biggest one day fall for over eight months and billions were wiped off the values of HSBC and Standard Chartered, the two British banks with the greatest exposure to the Gulf state.

Yesterday’s events followed unnervingly hard on the heels of the warning earlier this week by the IMF’s managing director, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, that half of banks’ toxic assets remain to be revealed.  The Dubai episode raises the spectre of entire states, rather than corporations, defaulting:  already, investors in countries such as Greece, Russia and Mexico are seeing the cost of insurance against default rocketing.

All this has severe implications for the United Kingdom. Last month, there were concerns that the credit ratings agency, Moody’s, was considering downgrading the UK’s triple-A status.  The Dubai experience may cause those concerns to reappear.   Ken Clarke referred to the consequences in his wind-up yesterday:

Foreigners will eventually have to finance the debt. As my hon. Friend the Member for Cities of London and Westminster explained clearly, with the level of debt being run up by other developed countries, we have to persuade people to have confidence in this country to buy sterling-denominated assets and to finance our debt at an affordable price. Several Members warned about the rising level of debt interest as part of the public debt. Of course, as interest rates are brought back to a more normal level, if we are driven to higher interest rates because we have to sell our gilts and have to get somebody to accept the risk of financing our debt, we will find our economy slowed down by rising interest rates and the cost of servicing the debt will go up, perhaps leading us into a debt trap.

The problem is that, because of the imminence of the general election, the Government – or, to be more precise, Gordon Brown himself  – remains reluctant to admit the full scale of the appalling economic difficulties that the country faces; it maintains the palpably ludicrous fiction that Britain’s structural deficit can be brought under control simply by legislating it away.  Its stance is reactive, rather than proactive, and increasingly divorced from reality.

And that is a stance that will cause huge dangers for this country at a time when whole nations, rather than corporations, start to fall like dominoes.

Insulted by Ken

Spoke this evening in the debate on the economy – the final stage in the wider debate on the Queen’s Speech – and focused on the appalling damage being done to the construction industry in North Wales and the lack of effective Government support for the sector.

Ken Clarke wound up for the Opposition – apparently, his first wind-up for some 20 years.  He was both hugely entertaining and forensically destructive of the Government’s position.  His closing remarks were as follows:

I am a great fan of Benjamin Disraeli, and I looked up a passage that I often quote slightly inaccurately. Denouncing the dying Government of Mr. Gladstone in the early 1870s, Disraeli—he was about my age then, and sustained himself with a very large amount of liquor while making his three-hour speech in Manchester; only water is sustaining me—used a very grand phrase. He said:

“The ministers remind me of one of those marine landscapes not very unusual on the coast of South America. You behold a range of exhausted volcanoes. Not a flame flickers on a single pallid crest.”

That quotation is not really suitable for today’s debate, however. These Ministers could not be described as volcanoes. They were merely foothills when they started. The Queen’s Speech shows that they are finished, and it is a pity that they go out on such a low note.

The replying Minister, Pat McFadden, rose to his feet to cries of: “Follow that!”   He had a broad grin on his usually funereal countenance, as if he deemed it a great privilege to be insulted by Ken.

Which, thinking about it, it probably was.

Hain’s triumph

In the wake of yesterday’s statement by Jim Murphy on Scotland, Peter Hain, determined not to be outdone, today announced, with considerable fanfare and flourish, that he had secured from the Treasury a commitment that Wales would receive a “fairer funding agreement” than that provided by the Barnett formula:

The new arrangements are as follows:

  • the Government agrees that the Barnett formula could lead to convergence to an extent that would be regarded as unacceptable although further convergence is not currently expected in the coming years;
  • the Government will make a full assessment of the extent of convergence with consideration of Wales’s position relative to other parts of the United Kingdom as part of each spending review; and
  • following this assessment the Government would be prepared to take action if appropriate to ensure Wales is not disproportionately disadvantaged.

Now call me a troublesome old nit-picker, but the “new arrangements” are nothing of the sort.  All that Peter has announced in reality is that at the time of the next spending review the Government will think about whether or not Wales is disadvantaged and then may, just may, take some unspecified action. 

Or not.

Peter Hain is clearly a man who knows how to drive a hard bargain.

Ignoring Harriet

The Leader of the House, Harriet Harman, was more than usually confused at Business Questions today, losing her notes and appearing generally flustered. 

She was pressed repeatedly by several Members, including the shadow Leader, Sir George Young, as to why the Government did not propose to make a statement on the local government settlement.  Finally, she lost the plot altogether:

Mr. Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) (Con): In every single previous year, the appropriate Secretary of State has come to the Dispatch Box to give an oral statement on the local government settlement, and there has been, entirely separately, a pre-Budget report from the Chancellor. Why is that not happening this year, and what have the Government got to hide?

Ms Harman: I understand that there has been cross-party discussion on this, and there is an answer. [Interruption.] This is a serious point. This settlement is the final one of the first three-year settlements, and it is unchanged from January 2008. Therefore, following discussions with Opposition Front Benchers, the usual procedure was not seen as necessary. A letter was sent to Opposition spokespeople about this on 12 November, and there have been no objections from Front Benchers. [Interruption.] No, I see that that is not so. Ignore what I have just said—I will look into it.

I’m not entirely sure how far back Harriet wanted us to go in ignoring what she had to say.  Erring on the side of prudence and caution, I intend to start somewhere around May, 2005.

Hain don’t want to go to Chelsea

Peter Hain appeared before the Welsh Assembly today on his annual visit to present the Queen’s Speech.

In fact, the Queen’s Speech featured little in the proceedings, which were devoted primarily to Tory-bashing; so far, so predictable.

However, Peter did spring a huge surprise when he announced that he, like Sir Emyr Jones-Parry, was a Swansea City fan.

The surely cannot be the same Peter Hain whose website informs us, in effusive terms:

Other than his family, Peter’s real passion is football and his beloved Chelsea FC which he first started supporting in 1965. As anyone who’s managed his diary knows, Chelsea matches come out of the diary at great risk to career and office calm (and on the rare occasions they lose a match is never the best time to ask for a day off).

“I have been a Chelsea fanatic since 1965 and have watched all the stars, like Peter Osgood the most brilliant striker in British football and worldwide, especially in his heyday before he broke his leg”.

Alas for Chelsea,  Peter’s affections have now apparently been transferred from Stamford Bridge to the Liberty Stadium. 

Nothing worse than a glory-chaser.

Spirit of Harry Lauder

Some rarely-seen but highly entertaining Caledonian wit was on display at Scottish Questions today:

David Mundell (Dumfriesshire, Clydesdale and Tweeddale) (Con): May I be the first to congratulate the Secretary of State on being named best Scot at Westminster? I am sure the Prime Minister is delighted.

Mr. Murphy: I thank the hon. Gentleman for his best wishes on my award. It was a very long shortlist, but I noticed he was not on it.

Good news from the Bryn

Excellent news this evening.  The Bryn Euryn management committee, having considered a feasibility study, has resolved not to turn over any part of the Bryn to grazing, which will allow continued unrestricted access to walkers and their dogs.

I cannot recall any local proposal that was more unpopular than this one.  A campaign that began with a rally in June (see above) and continued with a packed and very robust public meeting in September has had an entirely satisfactory conclusion.

This was a mean-spirited and misconceived proposal that was rightly rejected and vigorously opposed by the users of the Bryn.  Its defeat is a tribute to all involved in the campaign.  Well done, everyone!

Well played, Sir Humphrey

One has to hand it to Gordon Brown: fixing it for Baroness Ashton to become the new EU High Representative was pretty fancy footwork. 

I’m sure Lady Ashton is a thoroughly decent person and was no doubt an outstanding chairman of Hertfordshire health authority.  None of her  life experiences thus far, however, would appear to render her over-qualified for the role of European foreign minister.

And that, of course, is the point.  Lady Ashton will not be a foreign minister; she will, in effect, be a manager, seeking to coordinate the frequently mutually contradictory foreign policy of the 27 EU member states.  It will, of course, be an impossible task. 

Already, continental Eurocrats are complaining.  Agence France Presse quotes an aggrieved European diplomat bemoaning:

“The British wanted to kill the post of High Representative.  They have succeeded. This will set us back five years.”

The whole affair is redolent of the famous Yes Minister episode in which Humphrey patiently explains to the Minister precisely why Britain is in Europe:

“Britain has had the same foreign policy objective for at least the last 500 years: to create a disunited Europe… Divide and rule, you see; why should we change now, when it’s worked so well?”

Plus ça change…

The Loyal Address

The debate on the Queen’s speech is one of the great set-pieces of the Parliamentary year.  Yesterday, the Loyal Address was proposed by Frank Dobson, the veteran MP for Holborn and St Pancras, who is both delightfully unreconstructed Old Labour and a very kind man (he once offered to buy me a coffee when I found myself without funds at the Portcullis House coffee shop).

Frank’s speech was extremely funny; the following story about his predecessor, Lena Jeger, gives a flavour:

She used to retell the tale that at her by-election in 1953 she was canvassing the top flat of a block in Camden Town. She launched into the great left-wing issue of the day—German rearmament and the threat it posed to international security. She stopped for breath, and the woman at the door asked, “Did you come up in the lift?”, and Lena says, “Yes.” “Stinks of pee, doesn’t it?” says the woman. “Yes,” says Lena. “Can’t you stop ’em peeing in our lift?” says the woman. “I don’t think I can,” says Lena. “Well,” says the woman, “if you can’t stop ’em peeing in our lift, how can you expect me to believe you can stop the Germans rearming?” A timeless lesson for us all.

The chamber was, of course, very full for the opening of the debate.  As a consequence, I found myself sitting on the furthermost back benches, behind the DUP and the small contingent from Plaid Cymru and the SNP.

David Cameron opened his contribution by congratulating Frank Dobson and Emily Thornberry, the Labour MP who had seconded the Loyal Address.  He then went on to welcome William Bain, the new Labour Member for Glasgow North-East, who had just taken his seat:

I expect that we will see the hon. Gentleman back in the House after the next election. I am sure there are many things that we will disagree about, but one thing on which I hope we will always agree is that we should never do anything to break up our United Kingdom.

At that point, one of the Plaid Cymru MPs dug his SNP neighbour in the ribs; they glanced at each other and both sniggered. 

It was a telling moment.

In sympathy for the Queen

Have just returned from the State opening, feeling desperately sorry for the Queen having to repeat the preposterous catalogue of electioneering claptrap that the Government put into her mouth.

They know that very little, if any, of it can be delivered before next March, when Parliament is likely to be dissolved, yet they have Her Majesty assure us, in all solemnity, that they will most certainly be establishing an elected House of Lords.

If ever the Queen demonstrated she deserves every penny of the Civil List, today was surely the day.

Hot gossip from Brussels

Early evening return from Brussels, where I have spent a couple of days visiting various European institutions, including the Parliament, the Commission, UKRep (the UK permanent representation to the EU) and the Welsh Assembly Government EU Office.

Brussels is a tremendously gossipy place at the best of times (even more so than Westminster), but at the moment is full of fevered speculation as to the outcome of the heads of government summit on Thursday, when the president of the European Council and the EU High Representative will be selected.

The generally accepted view is that Tony Blair is out of the running for president and that the Belgian Prime Minister, Herman Van Rompuy, is the hot favourite. 

Surprisingly enough, however, and more interestingly, there is a considerable body of opinion that David Miliband is still very much in the running for the possibly more powerful position of High Representative, notwithstanding the protestations of both the Foreign Secretary and his brother that he has ruled himself out.  Given that Van Rompuy is a centre right politician from a small country, the theory is that the High Rep position must go to a centre left candidate from a big country and that Miliband is the most obvious candidate. 

If that happens, it will be fascinating to see the response from within the Labour party.

The Eurostar, by the way, was spectacularly good.  It pulled out of Brussels Midi station at 4.00 pm and just over two hours later arrived at St Pancras.  Beats air travel any time.

Unsung heroes

Abergele surgery today, with a number of heavy appointments.

After it was over, I looked in at a coffee morning organised in aid of the maxillofacial unit at Glan Clwyd hospital.  The event was packed out and raised over £540 in the space of just a couple of hours.

The extraordinary thing about these events is that they are always organised by a core element of precisely the same people.  They support all the good causes in the community and give hours of their time without the expectation of reward, or even recognition.

When people talk of “unsung heroes”, these are the sort of individuals they should have in mind.  They are to be found the length and breadth of the country, organising raffles, street collections, coffee mornings and bring and buys; they are the backbone of our communities and we simply couldn’t function without them.