Monthly Archives: May 2009

Brown’s vision

Gordon BrownHaving received confirmation from the Crown Prosecution Service that he will face no charges over Donorgate, Labour’s former general secretary, Peter Watt, has wasted no time in telling the world what he thinks of Gordon Brown.

Today’s Sunday Times carries a taster for what will, no doubt, in due course be a fuller exposé of the way the Prime Minister operates.

Watt clearly feels scapegoated by the PM over the Abrahams affair and, despite protestations to the contrary, his bitterness is apparent in his comments to the Times:

Publicly, Gordon talks about values and his moral compass, but actually the way he conducts himself behind the scenes is anything but that – it’s brutal…

“This is Gordon’s politics: when things go wrong you find someone to blame.”

Most interestingly, Watt discloses what he says is the truth about “the election that never was”:

“No matter what anyone says, the election had been called and was then cancelled. We had been working on it for weeks.  We spent £1.2m in immediate preparations.”

Readers will recall that when Brown announced that there would be no election in 2007, he said he wanted time to “set out his vision” for the country. 

Eighteen months later, we see a ruined economy, mounting unemployment, a collapsing social system and – as a reader commented yesterday – “a palpable sense of vacuum” at the heart of Brown’s Government.

We’ve had the vision.  Now please may we have the election?

Brown’s perfect storm

brown-despairTo Ruthin, for a particularly lengthy and heavy surgery.

The journey through the Vale of Clwyd, normally a delight, is rendered somewhat more sombre by the wall-to-wall coverage on the car radio of the MPs’ expenses issue.  The effect of all this on the reputation of Parliament is deeply corrosive.  Sir Christopher Kelly’s report can’t come quickly enough, so far as I’m concerned.

I listen to the Week in Westminster.  There is a quite astonishing discussion between Steve Richards and three senior Labour MPs, Gisela Stuart, Chris Mullin and George Mudie.  All three are desperately downbeat, Chris Mullin in particular.  He takes the view that only an upturn in the economy – possibly early next year – can leave Labour “still in with a chance” of winning the next general election.

George Mudie goes further.  He thinks Gordon Brown is facing “the perfect storm” of a bad European election result combined with backbench trouble over the part-privatisation of Royal Mail, which could end his premiership.  Mudie thinks that Brown will be under severe pressure until July; after that, he as much as says, it will be too late and Labour will be stuck with him until polling day.

The fact that three such senior people feel free to appear on radio and give such a bleak assessment of their party’s prospects says a great deal about morale and discipline within Labour.  All three sound thoroughly, miserably defeated.

I reflect how depressing this must be for the Prime Minister, if he is listening, too.  Why, in heaven’s name, doesn’t he put an end to it and call an immediate election? 

This is doing the country no good at all.

Lumleyed

Two Labour MPs were watching Sky News on one of the Commons TV screens last night, hugely enjoying the discomfiture of Home Office minister Phil Woolas as he was comprehensively handbagged by the redoubtable Joanna Lumley.

When Miss Lumley informed the squirming Woolas that she would now help the Government write the rules governing immigration rights for Gurkhas, one MP said to the other, “Makes you wonder who’s running the country: Gordon Brown or Joanna Lumley.”

“I think we both know the answer to that,” his colleague replied.

 

Marriage of convenience

Speaking of the Welsh Grand Committee, I was hugely entertained by attacks by Plaid Cymru Members on Labour’s economic competence and the dodginess of Treasury figures for the reduction in support to the Welsh Assembly Government.

I intervened twice to enquire why, if they considered Labour to be so incompetent and unreliable, they were happy to prop them up in Cardiff;  I received no satisfactory answer.

I suppose Plaid would say that I don’t understand the political niceties that permit simultaneous opposition at Westminster and coalition in Cardiff Bay. 

Maybe I don’t, but I do recognise opportunism when I see it.

In denial

The Welsh Grand Committee convened today to debate the implications of the Budget for Wales.  

To give credit to Paul Murphy, who has restored the committee to its rightful role of debating Welsh issues in a Westminster context, the debate was timely, coinciding as it did with the second reading of the Finance Bill on the floor of the House. 

Labour Members were in complete denial that the economic crisis is anything whatever to do with the Government’s mismanagement of the nation’s affairs over the last twelve years.  Paul Murphy used the word “global” within thirty seconds of rising to open the debate.  There was repeated reference to the need to “grow the economy out of recession”, as if that can be achieved painlessly, without borrowing to the extent of reducing the country to penury. 

Coincidentally, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research reported today on the options available to the Government to restore the country’s finances to health.  These are: 

  1. requiring everyone, both men and women, to work  to the age of 70; or
  2. raising the basic rate of income tax by 15p in the pound; or
  3. cutting Government spending by a tenth, with an obvious impact upon frontline services and, needless to say, a corresponding Barnettised cut in the budget of the Welsh Assembly Government.

I suppose it might be possible to come up with a combination of the three, but the overall effect would be just as unpalatable.

When I observed, in winding up, that, like every Labour administration before them, this Government had succeeded in destroying the national finances and bringing the country to the brink of bankruptcy, the Members on the opposite benches seemed rather peeved.

 I personally thought it was fair comment.

Kevin Maguire is right

I don’t think I’ve ever agreed with the Mirror’s usually uncritical Labour cheerleader, Kevin Maguire, before, but, to my chagrin, I concur with every word of his latest blog post.

Or perhaps he agrees with mine of yesterday.  

Two ringing denials

harriet-harman1Harriet Harman has just appeared on Today, back-pedalling like fury, and denying absolutely that she cherishes any personal leadership ambitions whatever – even if Alan Johnson throws his hat in the ring.  We’ll see.

She also  asserted, remarkably firmly and apparently seriously, that there was unity within the party.

When it was put to her by a quizzical John Humphrys that Hazel Blears’s Observer piece was hardly a ringing endorsement for Gordon Brown, Harman replied that Blears had denied that ringingly, too.

Today’s Guardian reports the terms of Blears’s “ringing denial”:

Blears said her description of a “lamentable” failure by the government to get its message across had been an attack on all of her colleagues, not just Brown.

I’m sure that will go down really well around the cabinet table.

Helpful Harriet

harriet-harmanIt’s turning out to be another eventful holiday weekend for Gordon Brown.

Just as Easter was dominated by the McBride affair, so the May Day bank holiday – surely a time, if ever there was one, for Socialist unity – is being taken over by Labour infighting that has now spread from the back benches to the cabinet itself.

Hazel Blears’s helpful Observer critique of Brown’s performance forced Alan Johnson and Jack Straw to ride to their leader’s aid this afternoon, both denying any personal ambition and pronouncing Gordon the individual supremely equipped to lead the country out of the economic morass in which it flounders.   

Now Harriet Harman, according to the Telegraph, has upped the ante by letting it be known that if Brown is persuaded to step down or is challenged by Johnson or Straw, she will not stand aside and allow an orderly succession, but will enter the fray herself.

In a perverse way, this may prove of assistance to Brown.  The last thing Labour need, twelve months out from a general election, is a lengthy leadership election that focuses prolonged attention on the party’s internal divisions.

That’s the logic, but the reality may be very different.  Labour’s mood is highly febrile and no attempt is being made to conceal the disarray within the party.  Projections such as this won’t improve matters, either.  Some members of the Parliamentary party may take the view that they have little to lose and possibly much to gain by trying to get rid of Gordon. 

If that happens, it will be a very bloody summer.

Clearing the air

Hazel Blears has apparently been gently persuaded by a concerned No 10 to issue a clarification of her piece in this morning’s Observer, which, to the untrained eye, appeared a tad critical of the Government’s performance under the leadership of Gordon Brown.  Here’s a selection of highlights:

“Labour ministers have a collective responsibility for the government’s lamentable failure to get our message across. All too often we announce new strategies or five-year plans, or launch new documents – often with colossal price tags attached – that are received by the public with incredulity at best and, at worst, with hostility. Whatever the problems of the recession, the answer is not more government documents or big speeches.”

“I’m not against new media. YouTube if you want to. But it’s no substitute for knocking on doors or setting up a stall in the town centre.”

“We approached the Gurkha issue purely rationally and were mown down by a wave of emotion in support of these brave, loyal fighters. We put ourselves on the wrong side of the British sense of fair play, and no political party can stay there for long without dire consequences.”

Now Hazel has put out a statement protesting that any criticism of her good friend Gordon was the furthest thing from her mind:

“Any suggestion that I intended what I wrote as criticism of him or his leadership is completely wrong.

“I fully support the collective decisions we take as a government. My article simply calls for the Labour Party to hit the streets campaigning against the Tories in the forthcoming local and European elections.”

Ah yes, of course.  Now it’s all clear.

But why, Hazel, the arch reference to YouTube?  Bit of a coincidence, really, given that the entire web, to say nothing of the House of Commons, has been cracking up over Gordon’s dabble with “the important medium of communication”. 

And why the echoes of the famous Thatcher soundbite?  Not, surely, trying to create one of your own?

Anyway, it’s good to have that little misunderstanding cleared up, and I’m quite sure Gordon harbours no ill-will. 

And, of course, Hazel  has herself been known to YouTube a bit when she wants to: 

Prescott speaks

john-prescott2The Telegraph carries a transcript of John Prescott’s interview (or rather soliloquy) on yesterday’s Today programme.  It was apparently intended to be helpful to the Prime Minister.

I shall set it out verbatim, for it is a classic of its kind:

“A bus is a good way to get over to campaigning. You know I’m into Facebooks and all that kind of new technology now. But I’m into face to face. You’ve got to go out in the market square.

“I undressed 450 students yesterday with Ed Miliband and Eddie Izzard and I did 300 last night.

“You have got to talk to our people and when I hear Charles Clarke saying it’s a shame, I have got to say … bit of dayjay vu. They were the same people who crawled out of the woodwork last September, told us they were finished, Gordon should go.

“Clarke actually did apologise later and said he thought he’d got it wrong. Now he’s back at it again. I just say to them, for God’s sake stop complaining and get campaigning.

“We’ve had great difficulties. If you go out in the market square, like in Liverpool, if you know here, they are asking all these questions about allowances, about Gurkhas, quite properly so, and you have got to answer them and in public as well.

“But what I do say, let’s make sure we get the big decisions right. I know you are a bit of a half glass man, half empty not full … Just turn back, you will hear them, when you have had the Americans saying there were signs that we are getting recovery both in America and here. Now, they are the big decisions, John, that and climate.

“Keep your eye on the big decisions and think about some of those. One, about whether it’s boom or bust. If you look at the 10 years, we didn’t have the 10 years of the Tories where you did have boom and bust. John, John, there were millions unemployed, there were millions into poverty. I don’t know what you are talking about.

“If you look at that card we produced in 1967 which I often bring on. I could give it you again and that card said what we would do and we delivered on it, largely due to Gordon Brown and Tony Blair. If you look at the actual point of the regulation, Gordon did bring in regulation. He was the man who used to warn us in Cabinet ‘if I can’t get the I-arm-F and the EU and the World Bank to recognise we need to change the finance’. He constantly complained he couldn’t get it done. By God, when we got the collapse they wanted to listen to Gordon Brown. Capitalisation, the building of the stimulus in the economy and now as we heard from President Obama an independence here.

“It’s beginning to turn and that regulatory framework wasn’t tough enough. Have a bit of perspective about it.

“Concentrate on the big decisions, really, that is get the economy right, climate change coming up this year. He’s working hard for that. The big decisions are right but I hear people say ‘I don’t like this smile’. For God’s sake do you go on an aeroplane, talk to the pilot and ask if he’s got a smile or not? Can he land the plane?

“It’s still a bit of a problem, the McBrides and all that, what was his name, I can’t remember now, doing that stupid email. They are still a bit of a problem.

“We have been making problems, as David Blunkett and Charles has said, and Charles, if you are ashamed to stay in the party it is obvious what you should do isn’t it? If you can’t work in it. I am really staggered when I hear a Labour MP that when come through this record and after all Charles has been in Cabinet, David has been in Cabinet. They are in and out. They out themselves. Stop complaining and start campaigning. I asked David to come campaigning and he said he couldn’t because he was going to a football match. Fine. But then you make a speech in Doncaster attacking.

“What I’m saying is, have the debate amongst ourselves, do the issues, have the debate, and David, come and join me on the campaign for God’s sake. Charles, well, he’s not a campaigner.”

John Prescott is standing down at the next General Election.  I, for one,  will sincerely miss him. 

Thousand apologies

My profound apologies to the ancient yew tree of Llangernyw.

In yesterday’s post on the Petryal Festival, I reported that the yew was over 3,000 years old and one of the oldest living organisms on the planet.

Yesterday evening, Sara and I attended a concert at St Digain’s church, given by young musicians from the Hereford Cathedral School.  The standards on display were astonishingly high; I am forever amazed at the huge and diverse talent possessed by young people in this country.

After the concert, I inspected the tree more closely; in fact, it is so enormous that it would be impossible not to.  A slate plaque has been erected informing the visitor:

“Cyn belled ag y mae rhywun yn gwybod, yr ywen hon yw’r goeden fwy hynaf yng Nghymru ac yn un o’r pethau byw hynaf yn y byd.  Fe amcangyfrir ei bod dros 4,000 o flynyddoedd oed.

“This yew tree is the oldest living tree known in Wales and is one of the oldest living things in the world.  Its estimated age is over 4,000 years.”

This means that the tree, incredibly, was a seedling sometime around the date of completion of Stonehenge.  According to Wikipedia (yes, I know about the health warnings), it is, jointly, the third oldest individual tree in the world.

By understating its age, I had unwittingly demoted it to only the tenth oldest.  An abject  apology is therefore due.

Toynbee still doesn’t get it

In today’s Guardian, Polly Toynbee, arguably the left’s pre-eminent mainstream apologist, indulges in a 1,100 word foot-stamping tantrum over the woes that have beset the Labour party under the leadership of Gordon Brown.  Polly, bless her, has finally woken up to the realisation that our poor country  is led by a man completely, wholly, utterly, pathetically and risibly incapable of filling the hugely demanding office that he coveted for so long:

Look back on the day he stood on the No 10 threshold: “I will be strong in purpose, steadfast in will, resolute in action in the service of what matters to the British people.” He reprised his school motto – “I will do my utmost” – and no doubt he did, but it hasn’t been enough. After all those angry years in waiting, he should have been mindful of the old saw: be careful what you wish for. Many said he had neither the temperament nor the political skills for the top job. I was among those who hoped he had, because you have to live in hope. How Blair’s people gloat – we told you so!

Reading the article thus far, I hoped that the scales had truly fallen from Polly’s eyes; that she now understood the extent of the left’s failure and would, at last, acknowledge the appalling pig’s breakfast Labour have made of this country, its institutions, its society  and its economy over the last twelve years.

Alas, not a bit of it.  Polly, despite her comprehensive rubbishing of the Great Leader and all his works, is still metaphorically with him in the bunker, plotting where and how to sabotage a victorious Conservative party.  She even employs the language of guerrilla warfare in doing so:

Labour needs to make sure as few of these [Tory candidates] as possible reach the Commons. Start with a scorched-earth pre-emption of all the easy cuts the Tories will promise: ID cards first, and the Trident madness, which even Tories now question. David Davis opened a debate on cutting benefits to the well-off that Labour could seize on. Now the old are less likely to be poor, savings can be made on universal payments. Transfer the money to the poorest before the Tories take it and give nothing back. Now I’m 60, why do I get free travel and winter fuel payments while still working? Get in on waste first – but earmark savings in ways the Tories never would.

“Scorched-earth”?   In other words, Poll, you want Gordon to jettison what are left of his principles and deliberately and vindictively hammer the prudent, coping classes – particularly the pensioners Labour have serially assaulted over the last decade-and-a-bit – still further.  And all just  to make it harder for an incoming Tory Government.  Sweet.

Polly, you just don’t get it.  Despite your belated acknowledgment  that Gordon is a duffer, you still  don’t comprehend the appalling magnitude of Labour’s failure – not just Brown’s – or the extent to which people across the board are desperate for a change.  You are still in shock, still in denial.

As if to prove it, your article concludes with the frankly astonishing statement:

The crash has changed ­everything and it needs Labour answers.

You clearly don’t understand:  Labour have no answers; they never did.  Or, if they have, they are the wrong ones. 

Labour, you see, are themselves the biggest part of the problem.

And, in any case, Polly, nobody’s listening any more.

Petryal festival

 

flowers-at-st-marys

This is shaping up to be an extraordinarily ecclesiastical weekend; I expect to be visiting five churches in three days.

Yesterday, I attended the opening of the Petryal festival, a celebtaion of sacred music and other activities in the churches of St Mary’s, Llanfair TH, St Sannan’s, Llansannan and St Digain’s, Llangernyw (notable for its 3,000 year-old yew tree, one of the oldest living organisms on the planet). 

In the evening, there was a concert at St Mary’s given by the choirs of St Peter’s Collegiate Church, Wolverhampton; a sublime experience in the ancient church, beautifully decorated with flowers (see above).

This area, the catchment of the River Elwy, is one of the loveliest parts of the constituency.  If you don’t know it, I strongly recommend a visit.

With friends like these…

Labour MPs are lining up to offer helpful advice to the Prime Minister in the wake of what has been called his worst week ever.

On this morning’s Today programme, David Blunkett was to be heard counselling against “self-inflicted wounds”, in the process – quite unintentionally, I’m sure – inflicting a few himself.

Next, in what appears to be a parade of former Home Secretaries, Charles Clarke told Radio Norwich (forever to be associated with immortal memory of Alan Partridge) of his shame, as a consequence of recent events, at being a Labour MP.

Both Blunkett and Clarke forbore from calling for Brown to step down.  Not so the ever-forthright Paul Flynn, who in his blog seems to propose just that by suggesting a most interesting replacement:

Rhodri Morgan is not exactly retiring on his 70th birthday at the end of September. But he will be announcing when he is retiring. Would that there was a mechanism to translate him to Westminster to lead Labour into next year’s election.

Now there’s a thought.