Monthly Archives: February 2009

No Balls

Ed Balls didn’t show up at Prime Minister’s Questions today.

Never look a gift horse…

white-horseIt has been announced that a 164 foot statue of a white horse – as tall as the Statue of Liberty – is to be constructed at Ebbsfleet, in Kent.  The statue, to be known as the “Ebbsfleet Landmark”,  is intended to be the south’s answer to Anthony Gormley’s Angel of the North.

Having seen a mock-up of the proposed work, I’m sure that the proprietors of a certain brand of scotch whisky will be rubbing their hands in anticipation of all that free advertising.

Straight choice

ballsEd Balls, the Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families, has caused much furore by his pronouncement at a Labour conference yesterday that the economic downturn is likely to be the worst for over one hundred years and  could lead to Thirties-style political extremism:

“The economy is going to define our politics in this region and in Britain in the next year, the next five years, the next 10 and even the next 15 years.

“I think that this is a financial crisis more extreme and more serious than that of the 1930s and we all remember how the politics of that era were shaped by the economy.”

Given that Mr Balls is Gordon Brown’s key adviser, closer to him than the Prime Ministerial underwear and privy to as much economic information as the Treasury possesses, this leaves Mr Brown with a choice of two courses of action.

On the one hand, he can acknowledge that Mr Balls is correct and that Britain has to batten down the hatches in preparation  for an indeterminate period of financial stringency, with all that implies; in other words, he can stop treating the British people like fools and start speaking to them as adults.

On the other, if Mr Balls is talking dangerous and alarmist nonsense, he can sack him.

No doubt the Prime Minister will act with his usual decisiveness.

Facing both ways

A positively bizarre letter from Lord Elis-Thomas in today’s Western Mail highlights the deep and seemingly irreconcilable  divisions within Plaid Cymru over nuclear energy in general and the proposed construction of Wylfa B in particular.

 In it, Dafydd El asserts that that “Plaid policies and our attitudes as elected representatives are based on principle and practice”.  In respect of Wylfa, however, practice would appear to have prevailed over principle.

Both he and his colleague Ieuan Wyn Jones have now confirmed their support for the building of Wylfa B; indeed, Mr Jones has said unequivocally that “the case for nuclear power has been made“.

Equally unequivocally, however, Plaid’s 2005 General Election manifesto declared that:

Plaid Cymru the Party of Wales does not support new nuclear power stations, particularly as civil nuclear power fuels nuclear weapons development; is heavily subsidised; and cannot safely dispose of the highly toxic waste.

Couldn’t really be clearer, could it?  And indeed, the policy was confirmed at Plaid’s annual conference two years later. 

Moreover, in an Assembly plenary debate on 26 September, 2007, Plaid’s spokeswoman, Leanne Wood, confirmed that: 

“Plaid Cymru, under all circumstances, will oppose any future proposal to locate a new nuclear power station at Wylfa”

Nobody, however, appears to have told Dafydd El or Ieuan Wyn Jones that. 

Such chaotic incoherence on the part of a party that is part of the governing coalition in the Assembly is, to say the least, surprising.  

In Mr Jones’s case, in particular, it is hard to see how, as leader of the party, he can credibly oppose at a constituency level a policy for which he himself has overall responsibility at a Welsh level.  That is clearly a nonsensical position and one that is wholly untenable.

Alp yourselves

snow_chainContemplating, as I am, the not wholly appealing prospect of a difficult journey through a snow-bound mid-Wales for a meeting in Llandrindod Wells tomorrow, I was intrigued by the latest piece of travel advice from the Transport Secretary, Geoff Hoon:

“Why has nobody got snow chains and why are you all whingeing about what the Government hasn’t done?  If you live in the Alps you have snow chains in the back of your car. So why have none of you intelligent, capable people got chains?”

Taking his counsel to heart, I consulted the Halfords website, but decided, on balance, that £54.99 was a bit steep for insurance against a once-in-eighteen-years event.  I might have made a different judgment had I indeed been living in Kitzbühel, rather than on the North Wales coast.

Nevertheless, Geoff’s robust disclaimer of responsibility for providing a reliable transport system is, in an odd way, refreshing.  It’s rare for any New Labour minister to suggest that there may be  limits to the role of government.   Perhaps his new-found enthusiasm for self-help will permeate into other departments of state. 

If so, I look forward to the day when Jacqui Smith urges people to defend themselves, their homes and property against criminals, by any reasonable means at their disposal, without fear of incurring the displeasure of the constabulary and courts.   That would be a real step forward.   She should have a word with Geoff.

Entente discordiale

gordon-brown1Further misery for the Prime Minister today, following President Sarkozy’s latest interview, carried simultaneously on three French TV channels last night.

Challenged on his policy to increase capital spending on infrastructure projects, rather than follow the British lead of tax cuts, M. Sarkozy dismissively retorted that the VAT rate reduction in Britain had “absolutely  not worked” and added:

“Britain is cutting taxes. That will bring them nothing. Consumption continues to decrease in Britain.”

This rubbishing of Gordon’s grand plan has not gone down too well in Downing Street;  there have apparently been urgent conversations today with the Elysée, as a consequence of which the Prime Minister’s spokesman has assured the press, in manner reminiscent of the Fast Show, that the President’s remarks “were not meant as a critique of UK economic policy – which is nice.” 

Let us hope he managed to keep a straight face as he delivered that line.

M. Sarkozy is not, of course,  the first senior foreign politician to express doubt over the wisdom of Mr Brown’s approach to the crisis.  In an interview with Newsweek in December, Peer Steinbrueck, the German finance minister, was even more outspoken in his criticism:

“Our British friends are now cutting their value-added tax. We have no idea how much of that stores will pass on to customers. Are you really going to buy a DVD player because it now costs £39.10 instead of £39.90? All this will do is raise Britain’s debt to a level that will take a whole generation to work off.  The same people who would never touch deficit spending are now tossing around billions.”

All this flak from foreign parts will certainly cause the Prime Minister damage domestically.  For months he has been attempting to paint the Tories as the “do nothing” party, a charge which hasn’t stuck and which advisers are now  urging him to drop.  At the same time, he has been loudly asserting that his brand of fiscal stimulus is the model that is being adopted across the globe:

The Prime Minister: I think that people are beginning to understand around the world that we are dealing with a new situation of lower inflation next year, a downturn and a credit crunch. That requires very special measures to deal with unprecedented circumstances. I believe that around the world there is now increasing support for the policy that we have put forward, in addition to the recapitalisation of the banks, and that is a fiscal stimulus to back up interest rate cuts. While the Conservatives say that that is unacceptable to them, it is now happening in Germany, France, Spain, Australia, China and America.  It is about time the Conservatives entered the real world. [Hansard, 12 November, 2008.]

The problem for Gordon is that it manifestly  isn’t  happening in Germany or in France.  Germany and France appear to take the view that Gordon is barking up the wrong tree. 

The consequence is that it is the Prime Minister himself, and not the Conservatives, who is now looking increasingly isolated.   This means, at the very least, that he will have to rethink his line of attack on the Tories and will probably  also have to carry out an urgent review of his economic strategy before Alistair Darling’s Budget statement next month.

Obama’s good friend

There is intense rivalry among European leaders over who will be the first to meet President Obama after his inauguration. 

Gordon Brown will no doubt have been quietly pleased that he was the first to receive a telephone call from the new President. 

But imagine how he will feel when he sees this.

Can’t rush these things

The Farmers’ Union of Wales held its annual Parliamentary lunch today in the Cholmondeley Room in the House of Lords. 

The speaker was the area director of the National Westminster Bank, who told us that, despite reports of frozen credit lines, the bank was intent on lending an additional £6 billion in the coming year.  Good news, and I await developments.

He also told us that the former National Provincial Bank of England had moved into Wales as long ago as the 1860s, chasing the solid agricultural customer base to be found there.  The first branches were in Newtown, Aberystwyth and Cowbridge.

When the Bank decided to open its first branch in Cardiff – in St Mary’s Street, now the busiest street in the city – it was set up as a sub-branch of Cowbridge.   It makes one wonder at what point and in what circumstances the cautious directors of the NP decided that the up-and-coming coal port might have a future independent of its established rural neighbour.

Slip of the tongue?

A clue, during PMQs, as to how bad the Prime Minister thinks the downturn really is:

The Prime Minister: I have made it clear throughout the past few months that the biggest danger that the world faces is a retreat into protectionism. I have also made it clear that, as a result of the withdrawal of foreign banking capacity in large numbers of countries, we face a downward spiral whereby these countries cannot borrow from anybody because foreign banks have left. That is all the more reason why, first, we should sign the Doha agreement-that will feature on the G20 agenda-and secondly, we should ensure that every country is analysed by the World Trade Organisation on what it is doing to prevent protectionism. It is also absolutely clear that we should agree, as a world, on a monetary and fiscal stimulus that will take the world out of depression.

It was months after it became abundantly clear that the economy had taken a turn for the worse before the PM would utter the word “recession”.  The fact that he now uses the word “depression” means that he must think things are very bad indeed.

A recession, of course, means two consecutive quarters of negative growth.  This was officially confirmed last month, but commentators seem to agree that, in reality, we entered recession last April, at the latest. 

Recessions come and go and most middle-aged adults have experienced at least three during their lives.  Depressions, however, are economic reverses of a wholly different magnitude, usually a decline in GDP of at least 10 per cent. 

The last real depression to affect the western world was in the 1930s.  The very word conjures up the spectres of dole queues, soup kitchens and Jarrow marchers.  Not happy images, and one can only hope that this was nothing more than  a slip of the Prime Ministerial tongue.

Sorry, he’s busy right now

Prime Minister’s Questions again today, when David Cameron focused – not unreasonably – on the stupidity of the Prime Minister’s promise of “British jobs for British workers”, which, along with “boom and bust” is likely to haunt him through to election day.

During the exchanges, Mr Brown let slip that he found it difficult to get other world leaders to accept his phone calls:

Mr. Cameron: The two countries that most need to give ground to achieve action on the Doha round-India and the US-will both be present at the G20. As the Prime Minister said, the aims of the G20 refer to advancing the Doha trade round. Should we not be clear that anything less than removing the barriers to agreement would represent a failure?

The Prime Minister: I tried very hard before Christmas to talk to both President Bush and the Indian Prime Minister so that we could make progress on this.

Tory heckler: Gordon who?

Chairs of benches

Don’t want to turn today’s posts into a paean of praise for the Justice Secretary, but the House was much amused by the way he dealt with the derision prompted by his inadvertently comic use of politically correct gender-neutral terminology:

Mr. Straw: I commend the hon. Lady for her work on this matter and the way in which she has drawn it to the attention of the House and myself. I recently met the Magistrates Association and the association of chairs of benches of magistrates-[HON. MEMBERS: "Chairs of benches?"] Well, they were the chairmen of benches, some of whom were female. 

I wonder how well he is acquainted with the editor of the Federation of Small Businesses newsletter.

All right, Jack

jack-strawI have blogged previously about how much time I have for the Justice Secretary, Jack Straw.  He is one of the more straightforward cabinet members; you rarely get much flannel from him. 

Today, in Justice Questions, however, Jack exceeded himself in candour.  I tackled him about the controversial End of Custody licence scheme.  This was introduced in June, 2007, by his predecessor, Lord Falconer, as a “temporary measure” to relieve prison overcrowding (caused by Labour’s failure to build enough prisons).  Eighteen months later, it shows no sign of being ended.  Worryingly, during that time one in fifty prisoners released on licence has reoffended, sometimes very seriously indeed.

A thoroughly bad state of affairs, but I did not anticipate just how readily Jack would acknowledge it:

Mr. Jones: When the scheme was announced by the Lord Chancellor’s predecessor in June 2007, he described it as a temporary measure. Since then, some 47,500 prisoners have been released early, of whom more than 950 have offended while on licence; those offences include three murders and two rapes. In the circumstances, does not the Secretary of State agree that when his colleague Lord Bach said last month that

“it is not entirely a satisfactory scheme”-[Official Report, House of Lords, 20 January 2009; Vol. 706, c. 1555]

he was guilty of the greatest understatement imaginable? Is it not, in fact, a positively dangerous scheme, and when does he propose to end it?

Mr. Straw: Personally, I would take out the adverb: it is not a satisfactory scheme. However, it is better than the alternative, and far better, in terms of seeking to manage the prison population to capacity, than the devices to which the Conservative Administration whom the hon. Gentleman supported used to resort. At one stage, the Conservative Administration had 3,500 prisoners packed into police cells in wholly unsatisfactory circumstances. Over a couple of months, a previous Conservative Home Secretary released 3,500 prisoners, including some who, because of the severity of their sentences, would be quite beyond the current categories eligible for an end of custody licence.

You can’t say fairer than that.  Jack put his hands up to the charge and responded with a bit of political knockabout.    I can name at least a dozen other ministers who wouldn’t have been so decent.

Deserted city

clock_tower1

February has brought with it the harshest weather I have experienced since I arrived in Parliament. 

This morning, I trudged to the House along streets empty of traffic through snow six inches deep and through a stillness seldom experienced in the centre of the capital.   There were very few pedestrians about, apart from a group of schoolchildren enjoying a snowball fight, which I found particularly pleasing. Healthansafety clearly not an issue there.

Parliament itself was deserted; no buses, tubes or trains were running and Central Lobby, the hub of the old building, was empty.  The photographers were out in strength, however, and I cursed myself for not bringing my own camera; I had to make do with my mobile phone.

Despite the inconvenience of it all, it was a memorable day, and probably one we won’t experience again too soon.   London is a truly beautiful city, and even more beautiful in the snow.