Monthly Archives: January 2009

Cold day in Min-y-Don

minydon

Attended the launch, in Min-y-Don Gardens, of Colwyn’s challenge in the 2009 Wales in Bloom and Britain in Bloom competitions.  I have blogged about these events previously.  They are tremendously important in terms fostering civic pride and it’s good to see that, despite lukewarm support from the Welsh Assembly Government, they are still in being.

The redoubtable Cliff Prout was in charge of the proceedings once more, and a good crowd gathered in Min-y-Don around the sculpture of Maelgwyn Gwynedd, by local artist Mark Jackson.  Maelgwyn was a sixth century king of Gwynedd, whose citadel was the still-formidable outcrop known as the Vardre, near Deganwy.  

The photograph (courtesy of David Curtis) doesn’t convey just how cold it was in Min-y-Don.  However, even on a bleak winter’s day, the gardens looked very impressive and I’d urge everyone to pay a visit.

Empty rhetoric

The rash of walk-outs at energy installations across the country is regrettable, but not wholly surprising.   The workers have realised that Gordon Brown’s fine talk about British jobs for British workers was an undeliverable promise; empty rhetoric delivered with no higher object in mind than to get a round of applause at the 2007 Labour party conference.

Back in those days, of course, things were different.  Jobs were still in reasonable supply, while Brown himself was riding high in the polls, still enjoying the honeymoon that ended only a week later at the Conservative conference in Blackpool.

Now thousands of jobs are being lost on a daily basis and it must be increasingly apparent to the workers that Brown hasn’t a clue what to do about it.

Total UK must come in for criticism, too.   In times such as these, for a multinational to award a contract to an Italian firm without making provision for the employment of local labour is crassly insensitive. Any financial benefit Total has derived from the deal will have been more than outweighed by the loss of goodwill.

Welsh Questions

Welsh Questions today were dominated by the rapidly downturning Welsh economic outlook, which transcends in importance almost every other issue.  Islwyn’s Don Touhig took the opportunity to have a pop at Sir Emyr Jones-Parry’s constitutional convention

Mr. Touhig: When families across Wales are concerned about their future does my right hon. Friend think that anybody gives a fig about the All Wales Convention? It is wasting £1 million of taxpayers’ money, calling shambolic meetings, showing videos that give a distorted picture of Wales and pandering to those who think that the big issue of the day is independence. Would it not be better spending its time talking to the Corus workers?

The Secretary of State, Paul Murphy, appeared to have more than a smidgeon of sympathy with Mr Touhig’s point:

Mr. Murphy: I am grateful to my right hon. Friend for his robust comments on the work of the convention. I think that the convention is doing a proper job in trying to find out what the people of Wales would think about extra powers for the Assembly. I agree with him that it is more important to concentrate these days on the effects of the economic downturn on the people of Wales than on constitutional issues, but I do not undervalue the work of the convention. 

Paul Murphy’s forthrightness is one of his many fine qualities, and a reason for the respect he commands from colleagues on both sides of the House.  I asked a question about the actions of certain Labour MEPs, who voted last month to abolish Britain’s opt-out from the Working Time Directive.  Paul’s answer was succinct and unequivocal: 

 Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): Given the increasing numbers of job losses in south Wales, which of course include the 1,000 jobs lost at Corus this week, does the Secretary of State acknowledge the fundamental importance of maintaining flexibility in the labour market? Can he therefore confirm that the Government will continue to fight to maintain the British opt-out from the working time directive, notwithstanding the decision of Labour MEPs to support its abolition last month?

Mr. Murphy: Yes, I think that there should be as much flexibility as possible. That has helped us in the past, and I hope that it will do so in the future as well.

The Hansard technique

gordon-brown1Not everything that is said in the chamber of the House of Commons appears on the Hansard record.  Hansard is meticulous in recording the contributions of every speaker, to the extent of polishing them up, removing the ums and ers and the grammatical inconsistencies and generally making them fit to be read by future generations of scholars. 

However, Hansard does not, broadly speaking, record heckles, catcalls or similar noises off, unless the speaker makes reference to them. Consequently, an experienced speaker who wants to embarrass a heckler will make reference to what has been said “from a sedentary position”.   This ensures that the heckle gets onto the Hansard record and is preserved for posterity.  The same technique is used to record an injudicious shake or nod of the head or other embarrassing, though silent, gesticulation. 

The BBC’s Evan Davis employed the same stratagem in his interview with the Prime Minister on the Today programme yesterday – the day it was officially confirmed that Britain was in recession.  Davis was keen to get the PM to admit that he had made a chump of himself when he had boasted that Labour had abolished boom and bust:

‘”Boom and bust” has been a phrase much associated with you; you’re hanging your head even as I say the words.’

Brown immediately denied hanging his head.  Well done, Evan, I thought.  You’ve got him. You’ve made him look a plonker.

Unfortunately, however, Davis didn’t leave it there.  He was so desperate to get Gordon to fess up to his hubris, and thereby get a scoop that would be repeated on news bulletins thought the day,  that he persisted in dementedly squawking: “Boom and bust, boom and bust, admit it, that’s what we’ve had, we’ve had boom and bust, boom and bust on your watch.”

Brown, in response, refused (predictably enough) to give Davis his scalp.  He kept stonewalling the accusation, like a lugubrious Scottish Geoffrey Boycott hunkering down for a mammoth spell at the crease.  The word “global” was deployed to mind-numbing effect.

Davis should have left it with the single use of the Hansard technique.  Notwithstanding Brown’s denial, the image indelibly formed in the minds of the great British listening public would have been of the Prime Minister dejectedly hanging his great, shaggy head in shame at the terrible folly of his own punctured, overweening pride.

Wind in his sails

us-president-seal_svg1The Welsh Grand Committee convened yesterday to debate the Queen’s Speech and its significance for Wales.   Falling, as it did, on the day after the United States presidential inauguration, there was much mention made of President Obama and the new hope he offers America and the world. Indeed, my friend Hywel Francis mentioned him so often and postulated so many connections (some remarkably abstruse)  between Wales and Obama’s home state of Illinois, that I congratulated him in my wind-up for proving beyond reasonable doubt that the new Chief Executive is, in fact,  Welsh.

Obama’s first twenty-four hours in office were described as a “whirlwind” in this morning’s press.  Today, he has maintained the momentum, with a series of radical foreign policy announcements.  He is to initiate diplomacy with Iran “without preconditions” and will pursue the ambitious – some might say naïvely ambitious – goal of a nuclear-free world.  This evening, he appointed the distinguished senator, George Mitchell, as his envoy to the Middle East, with a brief to seek a lasting peace between Israel and the Arab world.  The equally distinguished Richard Holbrooke has been appointed emissary to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

And in a move clearly intended to symbolise the extent of his break with the Bush regime, the new President has announced the closure within twelve months of the prison camp at Guantánamo Bay, as well as other overseas CIA detention centres.

A lot of hope is riding on Obama and he presently enjoys an enormous, arguably unprecedented, fund of goodwill from around the world.  He is right to take advantage of that goodwill by being bold and ambitious in the earliest days of his administration, before – as is sadly inevitable – that most dispiriting characteristic of human nature, cynicism, begins to set in.

 But, just for now, he has the wind in his sails and the forces of optimism behind him.  Everyone must wish him well.

Iceland-on-Thames

My colleague Michael Fabricant has drawn my attention to this article in today’s edition of the New York Times (not generally known to be a Conservative-supporting publication).

As Michael remarks, can the authors really be writing about the same  Britain that  Gordon Brown boasts will “lead the world to financial stability“?

Talking furniture

The use of gender-neutral language is not without its hazards.

Today I received a newsletter from the Federation of Small Businesses (Wales), which contains a section headed: “From the Chair’s Desk”.

Graphic bust

graph1

From the ever-helpful House of Commons library comes the above graph, which illustrates the extent to which the UK’s current account deficit has grown since the election of the Labour Government in 1997. 

Note how the modest increase in service exports has been dwarfed by almost a tripling of imports of goods – evidence of Gordon Brown’s engineered consumer boom that has now come so spectacularly to grief.

Happy ending

Last Sunday evening, as the winter light was beginning to fail, I was driving along the A55 near Caerwys when, to my horror, I saw a man walking unsteadily down the centre of the slip road in the direction of the main carriageway.

Worried about what might happen to him, I called 999 on the hands-free.   The response was astonishingly impressive.  The call was picked up before the first ring and I was transferred with equal speed to the police operator, who took the details swiftly and assured me that a car would be sent immediately to the scene.

Yesterday afternoon, I visited the North Wales Police communications centre at St Asaph; the visit had been arranged several months ago, but, given my experience last weekend, I was interested to see how the emergency call system worked.

The communications centre is operated as a separate division within the force and is headed by Superintendent Peter Newton, assisted by my friend Chief Inspector Jane Banham, formerly district Inspector at Colwyn Bay.

The communications room is a vast area that resembles the bridge of the starship Enterprise.   Banks of computer screens record incidents as they come in.  I watched the progress of the investigation of a report of missing person near Mochdre; the car arrived and the officers relayed the information from the ground to the communications centre, where the Inspector in charge of the watch monitored its progress.

The computerised system is capable of pinpointing the position of every officer deployed in the force area with high accuracy.  Copy documents and photographs can be sent to the officer’s BlackBerry.  The whole operation is seamlessly integrated and is among the most advanced in the country, rivalled only by Cheshire.

I told Peter Newton about my experience on the A55; what, I wondered, had happened to the man I saw wandering towards the carriageway?  Quickly, he called the incident up on the screen.  Another motorist had also rung in, expressing concern.  A car had been despatched and discovered that the individual was a Pole, trying to hitch his way to Chester.  The police had picked him up and dropped him off safely further down the road.

It was, in every sense, a happy ending to the visit.

Back to normal

A word of apology for the lightness of blogging over the past week or so.

My laptop, on which I write most of my blog entries, had to be sent back to the manufacturers for repair.  I am pleased to report that it was returned yesterday, so normal service should soon be resumed.

Sad day for North Wales

Anglesey Aluminium has announced that its plant near Holyhead is expected to close at the end of September, with the possible loss of over 500 jobs. 

The company, in which Rio Tinto has a majority shareholding, is by far the largest employer in the area and the announcement will come as an enormous blow to the people of north Anglesey.

Rio Tinto’s announcement last month of 14,000 job losses worldwide had caused concern on Anglesey and there can be no doubt that the worldwide downturn is the most proximate cause of the plant’s closure.  However, the prospect of the closure of Wylfa nuclear power station, which generated electricity for the plant at favourable rates, cannot have helped.  Labour’s acceptance of nuclear energy has come far, far too late. 

This is a desperately sad day for North Wales.

Something spicy

chicken curryThe first open meeting of the urbane Sir Emyr Jones-Parry’s “All Wales Convention” will be held this evening in what we are assured are the entirely neutral surroundings of the Seaside Social and Labour Club in Port Talbot. 

As an inducement to attend, the public have been promised a free curry.  Cue for much mirth and weak punning along the lines of “currying favour with the electorate”, “selling your birthright for a mess of korma” and (best of a bad bunch) the BBC’s “Assembly ‘argy bhaji’ on the menu”.

Which prompts the question: just what is it about a curry that is so inherently funny?  It wouldn’t have been the same if, for example, sandwiches and sausage rolls had been on offer.

Biter bit

calendar1

Regular readers will know that I frequently tease the healthansafety industry in this blog, mostly to the approval of my readership, with the notable exception of Mark Tami, MP for Alyn and Deeside.

 I was therefore surprised and delighted to receive, in this morning’s post, a belated combined Christmas card and 2009 calendar from the Health and Safety Executive, the front cover of which is reproduced above.

I was very pleased to see that, contrary to popular opinion, the HSE do have a sense of humour.  I was a little less pleased when I impaled my index finger on the calendar’s spiral wire spine.

Article of faith

The Commons reconvened today after an over-long Christmas recess.  I was fortunate enough to be drawn for a question on the military threat of Iran to the security of Britain’s energy supply:

Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): What recent assessment he has made of potential military threats posed by Iran.   

The Secretary of State for Defence (Mr. John Hutton): We routinely assess the military capabilities of other nations’ armed forces, including those of Iran.

Mr. Jones: Last month, Iran conducted a major naval exercise in the gulf of Oman, involving more than 60 warships and military aircraft. Next month, the first shipments of liquefied natural gas will start sailing from Qatar to Milford Haven, and in due course LNG from the Persian gulf will account for some 25 per cent. of the gas consumed in this country. To what extent does the Secretary of State recognise the military threat of Iran to the security of British energy supply and to what extent is the UK working with its allies and the Gulf Co-operation Council to counter it?

Mr. Hutton: I welcome the hon. Gentleman’s remarks. He will understand that we take a close interest in these matters. Iran has the ability to contribute not just to greater global security, but to greater global energy security. Unfortunately, it is not doing that, so its influence remains malign and it poses a significant threat not just to global security, but to regional security. Naturally, we keep all those matters under careful review and we discuss all these concerns closely with our allies in the Gulf and elsewhere, but it remains the policy of Her Majesty’s Government to ensure that energy supply routes through the gulf of Aden remain open, and we have forces in place there to achieve just that.

It is to John Hutton’s credit that he was frank enough to admit that Iran does indeed pose a threat to British energy security.  However, it remains a concern that electricity generation in this country is now so dependent on imported gas from such an unstable region as the Persian Gulf and also from Russia, which has shown itself once again to be entirely willing, with complete equanimity, to cut off the energy supplies of an entire continent.

The former Labour energy minister, Brian Wilson, had an interesting article on the issue in yesterday’s Telegraph.  Wilson argues, rightly, that the Russian actions over the past few days make it clear beyond doubt that Britain must be prepared to be considerably more self-sufficient in energy.  He describes the prevailing view in government less than five years ago:

At that time, the nodding donkeys of Whitehall were preoccupied with ridding Britain of nuclear power. That seemed to me perverse, not least because it is our one serious source of carbon-free electricity at a time when carbon reduction is supposedly one of our national and global priorities.

Astonishingly, this had led the Labour Government to adopt a policy based on the premise that, by 2020, 70 per cent of our electricity would be generated from gas, 90 per cent of which would be imported. This was in the full awareness that, while there is currently a diversity of gas-exporting states, Russia would soon become virtually the sole supplier.

Wilson’s insight into the mindset of the Labour Government of the day is fascinating, but not surprising.  Opposition to nuclear power was virtually an article faith of this administration (many members of which, including Tony Blair, were past members of CND) for the first decade of its existence.  By the time it became blindingly obvious that only nuclear could provide the reliable, non-carbon emitting, baseload generation the country needs, it was almost too late.

The consequence is that we will belatedly get our new nuclear power stations, but will also, for the foreseeable future, be heavily reliant on imported gas, the goodwill of Vladimir Putin and the forbearance of the mullahs of Tehran.

Swallowing the pill

Regular readers will know that I have been banging on ad nauseam over the last few weeks over the need for the Government to free up credit by establishing a properly-funded loan guarantee scheme.  Peter Hain has called for such a scheme, as has Peter Riddell in this morning’s Times, and Mervyn King has said that that getting money flowing to businesses is “the most important way to stave off the recession”.

Gordon Brown has been dragging his feet, however – probably because establishing a guarantee scheme would mean swallowing the bitter pill of acknowledging that the Tories have been right on the issue all along.

However, the Guardian website this evening reports that Alistair Darling, “concerned over lack of activity in the money markets and tougher credit terms for companies”, is now, at last, actively considering a loan guarantee scheme:

Treasury officials are confident they can come up with a coherent package in the next week or two. They insist that the recapitalisation plan for large banks last year was a success because it prevented the banking system from collapsing. Now their attention has moved towards freeing up loans, but they believe they must act in a co-ordinated way with other countries.

So it looks like a conversion of Damascene proportions  is about to take place.  One could mutter about repenting sinners and so on, but it would be churlish.

Darling should now  insist on pressing ahead with the scheme, whatever his boss’s misgivings.  British business will thank him for it.