February 7, 2010

O’Brien is wrong; Terry deserved to be sacked

Mike O’Brien, Minister of State at the Department of Health, has decided to enter the debate over the sacking of John Terry as captain of the England football team.  Unfortunately, Mike has chosen to do so using the arguably inappropriate medium of Twitter, which, since it confines posts to a maximum of 140 characters, affords little opportunity for the development of reasoned debate.

Nevertheless, Mike, who is a highly intelligent lawyer, has apparently decided that his opinion on such a controversial moral issue can be satisfactorily encapsulated in fewer letters than those that appear on an HP sauce label, so here’s what he has to say:

The sacking of Terry is crass. Capello has bowed to tabloid pressure. Infidelity is bad but I saw no signs of fatigue in his football.

Sadly, Mike is missing the point, which is unfortunate, given that the whole point of Twitter is to be TO the point.  Terry has not been booted out of the England team (though many would say he should have been); he will, it would appear, still be gracing the turf of Wembley with his unfatigued presence, three lions emblazoned on his left breast.

No, Capello has dismissed Terry as captain of his country’s national side.  And Signor Capello was entirely right.

The captaincy of any national sporting side brings with it considerably more responsibility than that which comes with simply playing for it.  You become an ambassador for your country. You become, to use the hackneyed phrase, a role model.  Kids look up to you and aspire to be like you.  It’s a very heavy thing.

The Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, has lamented that Terry’s treatment by the media has, if anything, been far too lenient.  It is, he says, a matter of regret that “society has lost the sacred concept of faithfulness on staying true to one another during marriage”:

“Clearly, a lot of people think there’s no problem there and that’s a pity because adultery is adultery.”

Dr Williams is absolutely right, too.  Time was, for example, when adultery was a resigning issue for politicians.  Many would say it still ought to be, but that principle appears to have been watered down of late. We must await the next scandal to see what happens.

The irony of the Terry affair is that it should take an Italian to recognise that adultery should automatically disqualify an Englishman from leading his national side.

Capello, who once played for Rome, understands that, like Caesar’s wife, the captain of England should be above suspicion.

February 3, 2010

PMQs

A very lively Prime Minister’s Questions, with Gordon Brown on the ropes over his Damascene conversion to the AV voting system, as David Cameron put it, thirteen years into this Government and ninety days out from a general election.

Cameron and other Members also tackled the Prime Minister on the evidence given by the former Chief of the Defence Staff, Lord Walker, to the Chilcot inquiry that service chiefs had threatened to resign en masse because of cuts in defence spending.

“They’re all Tories,” yelled Chris Ruane (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) helpfully.

February 3, 2010

Good news for Birmingham

Great news for the people of Britain’s second city.  Erdington MP, Siôn Simon, has announced that he is to stand down at the general election, to concentrate on becoming Birmingham’s first elected mayor.

By way of assistance to Mr Simon, and to give people a taste of what they might expect from their wannabe next first citizen, here’s a clip of him displaying to fullest advantage his unique range of talents:

February 2, 2010

A bit of a foul-up

There was an unexpected interlude of hilarity yesterday in the otherwise dry-as-dust Work and Pensions Questions, which customarily takes the form of a litany of statistics, each of them grim and each of them concealing hundreds of thousands of untold individual miseries.

The senior Conservative, David Heathcoat-Amory, rose to his feet to ask the Secretary of State:

Mr. David Heathcoat-Amory (Wells) (Con): If she will estimate the total pension deficit liability in the public sector.   

A look of perplexity, followed by panic, crossed the faces of the five members of the ministerial team.  Nobody had the answer. Then Angela Eagle, who glories in the title of Minister for Pensions and the Ageing Society, and who had clearly been given the short straw by Yvette Cooper, rose and approached the dispatch box tentatively, as if it was an elaborately carved, brassbound form of improvised explosive device:

Angela Eagle: We have been told that this question has been transferred to Her Majesty’s Treasury.

Speaker Bercow, however, would have none of it:

Mr. Speaker: Order. Let me say to the hon. Lady that the House was certainly not aware of that. I was not aware of it, the question is on the Order Paper, and I know that she will offer us an answer.

Ms Eagle knew she was stuck with it and had to make the best of a bad job.  She paused, drew a deep breath, and ploughed on with her answer:

Angela Eagle: I am happy to offer an answer. The total pension deficit liability in the public sector is, off the top of my head, close to £600-odd billion, but this has to be seen in context. The pension liabilities are calculated over the next 80 years. In that context, it has to be borne in mind that the average size of a public sector pension is £4,000 to £5,000.

Mr. Speaker: So there is time for an update.

David Heathcoat-Amory could hardly contain his amusement:

Mr. Heathcoat-Amory: It is obvious that the Government do not have a clue. They cannot even find a Department to answer the question, so let me provide the answer. Outside agencies estimate that the public sector deficit liability is about £1 trillion, which is £1,000 billion. In the pre-Budget report, the Government were going to get that down by only £1 billion, which is one tenth of 1 per cent. Is it not obvious that in this area of policy and many others we need a change of Government to get the answers?

Ms Eagle knew that she had made a chump of herself; there was no saving the situation, so she decided that attack was the only option available to her:

Angela Eagle: The right hon. Gentleman persists in scaremongering about the provision of public sector pensions for millions of low-paid public sector workers. As I have said, the average pension payment is £5,000 a year. Those liabilities are perfectly sustainable and comprise between 1.5 and 2 per cent. of GDP. If the right hon. Gentleman is telling the House that the Opposition do not think that that is sustainable, what he is saying to the electorate in the forthcoming election is that they will take away the public sector pension provision of millions of public sector workers who are out there working hard to keep our public services going in difficult times—and that, Mr. Speaker, is an absolute disgrace.

But she knew she had blown it and that, furthermore, she had been offered up by her four colleagues to take the elegantly-delivered kicking from Mr Heathcoat-Amory.

With a look approaching fury, she turned to her officials sitting in the box behind the Speaker’s chair and mouthed venomously: “That was a complete foul-up”.

At least, I think she said “foul-up”.  The “f” was clear enough.

January 30, 2010

The old tricks don’t work now

Tony Blair’s appearance at the Chilcot inquiry into the Iraq war yesterday was inevitably controversial.  Equally inevitably, it revealed little or nothing that we did not already know.

If anyone had hoped that the former Prime Minister would recant his decision to take the country into a war that was almost certainly illegal, he would have been disappointed.  There was no apology, no regret; the bereaved parents of servicemen who filled the public gallery would undoubtedly have left feeling cheated of the “closure” that they hoped Blair’s testimony would bring them.

Watching Blair yesterday evening on Newsnight, I was struck by how much he had physically changed since that 1997 May morning, when he swaggered into Downing Street, clasping the extended palms of the flag-waving Labour staffers who lined his way. 

Here was a grey, haggard, drawn-looking man, with a hunted look in his eyes, almost unrecognisable as his former self.  His hands, reported Newsnight, shook as he opened the bottle of water at the start of the six-hour evidence session.  He looked deeply ill at ease.

The old Blair communication devices, however, were still on display: the widened eyes (sincerity), the answers prefaced with “Look” (authority), the catch in the voice (emotion). 

But, truth is, we  all know those tricks now and they just don’t work any more.

The only wonder is that they ever did.

January 29, 2010

Travel news

At least that will be one thing less for the next Government to worry about.

At Transport Questions yesterday, the junior Transport Minister, Sadiq Khan, told the House that he had listened to representations from Newport East MP, Jessica Morden (presumably ignoring the rest of us) and was proposing to introduce the legislation necessary for the introduction of card payments on the Severn Bridge toll by April.

One further bit of good news was the announcement by his colleague, Chris Mole, that the Department for Transport is working up a proposal for the redoubling of the Swindon to Kemble railway line and hopes to provide further information about it “in the near future”.

The line is an important weekend link on the London to South Wales route and upgrading it would be widely welcomed by Welsh travellers, for whom it has long been a cause for complaint. 

It’s almost as if  an election were  in the offing.

January 28, 2010

Sorry, no credit

The saga of toll payment on the Severn bridge drones on.

Yesterday, Mr Ieuan Wyn Jones, transport minister in the Welsh Assembly Government, announced that credit and debit card payments on the bridge should become possible later in 2010.

The lack of a card payment facility has now become something of a scandal and an increasing source of annoyance for motorists.  A couple of years ago, on my way to the Royal Welsh show on a particularly hot day, I found myself stuck in a long queue behind a hapless individual who had clearly come out with insufficient cash and was obliged to conduct an elaborate negotiation with the toll attendant before he could be let through.  This must happen reasonably frequently, given that many people carry little cash in this age of chip and PIN.

According to the BBC News website, however, there will have to be a change to national legislation before card payments can be put in place.  Given that we are now in the dying days of this Parliament and the new Parliament will have rather a lot on its plate dealing with Gordon’s toxic legacy, we are probably in for at least one more summer of sticky, bad-tempered queues before the Severn crossing finally catches up with the twenty-first century.

January 27, 2010

Harriet misses the point

Prime Minister’s Questions today, with Harriet Harman deputising for the absent Gordon Brown:

Mr. David Jones (Clwyd, West) (Con): The Business Secretary once famously remarked that Labour was intensely relaxed about people getting filthy rich. Is the right hon. and learned Lady equally relaxed about how the Prime Minister’s predecessor has decided to go about it?

Ms Harman: We have asked the National Equality Panel to look at how we can ensure that we help social mobility and—[Interruption.]

Mr. Speaker: Order. I want to hear the answer.

Ms Harman: We are determined to ensure that there is social mobility, and one of the important findings of the NEP report is that more unequal societies have less social mobility, which is why we are determined, with Government action, to continue to support policies that spread fairness and equality.

I’m sure that the Rt Hon Tony Blair (Fettes, Oxford and Louis Vuitton) is intensely grateful for the leg-up.

January 27, 2010

Gordon’s luck

Gordon Brown’s notoriously bad luck manifested itself again today.  On the morning that the PM might have hoped to reap some modest cheer at the formal announcement of the end of the recession with news of 0.1 per cent growth in the last quarter of 2009, a Californian gentleman named Bill Gross went and burst his bubble.

Mr Gross is the founder and chief investment officer of Pimco, the world’s biggest bonds-based fund managers.  When he speaks, it matters, and his assessment of the prospects of the British economy is bleak indeed:

“The UK is a must to avoid. Its gilts are resting on a bed of nitroglycerine.

“High debt with the potential to devalue its currency present high risks for bond investors.

“In addition, its interest rates are already artificially influenced by accounting standards that at one point last year produced long-term real interest rates of 0.5 per cent and lower.”

No cheer there for the Prime Minister and, to make matters worse, it turns out that Pimco’s European operation is headed by Andrew Balls, the brother of the PM’s only remaining significant cabinet ally, Ed.

Gordon was absent from PMQs today, stuck in the Northern Ireland talks.  Given what he would have faced in the Commons, however, he may have found in  Belfast a blessed sanctuary.

January 25, 2010

Colwyn bay pier – the way forward

Press release dated 25 January, 2010:

Following last Friday’s meeting at Colwyn Bay Town Hall to discuss the future of the Victoria Pier, Clwyd West MP, David Jones, has arranged a meeting with Conwy Chief Executive, Byron Davies, on February 16, to discuss options for the way forward.

David Jones said:

“The large attendance at last Friday’s meeting showed the strong desire in Colwyn Bay to see the Victoria Pier restored. On a show of hands at the meeting, over 90% indicated that, not only did they support the pier’s restoration, but that they were willing to contribute to it financially.

“The principal stumbling block is the question of the pier’s ownership. It seems that the council remains in litigation with Mr Steve Hunt and that the freehold of the pier is still technically in the ownership of administrators.

“The council and Mr Hunt hold the key to progress. I feel very strongly that they should now negotiate actively with a view to finding an end to the dispute. Similarly, the administrators should be prepared to negotiate a settlement of their own claim. When that has been concluded, it should be possible to find a way of dealing with the legal title to the pier.

“Many people who spoke at the meeting, and most of those to whom I have spoken since, consider that the best way of proceeding is to set up a charitable trust, with a view to acquiring the pier and exploring the cost and best means of restoring it.

“This will probably require another meeting to form a steering committee. I am happy to facilitate such a meeting and anyone interested in this suggestion should please email my office at owenj at parliament.uk.

“The further meeting will take place after I have had my discussions with the council.”

 ENDS

January 23, 2010

Voices of Colwyn Bay

To repeat, the Colwyn Bay pier meeting was astonishingly well attended; even more people turned up than to the Walton meeting a couple of years ago.  Sadly, not everyone had received the message that pre-booking was desirable; the consequence was that an estimated 200 had to be turned away.  If you weren’t able to get in, apologies, but the very fact that you were turned away underlines how passionate people are about the pier.

And passion there certainly was in the council chamber.  A large number of people (including this blog’s commenters, David Curtis and Monty Slocombe) spoke with great feeling about how much they wanted to see the pier restored.  The pier, it seems, has become a symbol of Colwyn Bay’s relative decline; the desire to see it restored is also the desire to see the town regenerated.

I was truly sorry that Conwy county council decided not to send officer representation to the meeting; it is true that litigation with Mr Hunt is continuing, but I feel there was no reason why a representative could not have attended and listened quietly to the views expressed.  County and town councillors were, however, present and all credit to them for that.

Shows of hands revealed that an estimated 90 per cent or more of the audience wanted to see the pier restored, with a similar percentage willing to contribute financially to the project.  A large number appeared also to be willing to explore the possibility of forming a new charitable trust as a vehicle for the pier’s restoration.

My next step is to arrange a meeting with Conwy’s chief executive to discuss further progress.  It is essential that Mr Hunt, the county and the pier administrators enter into active dialogue to resolve the current legal dispute.  It would be tragic if further delay made the pier’s restoration even more of a challenge.

My thanks to fellow North Wales bloggers (especially Oscar, John Oddy, Jason Weyman and Chameleon) for helping to publicise the event.

And, most of all, my thanks to the people of Colwyn Bay for the passion and fighting spirit they showed last night.

January 22, 2010

Full house in the Bay

A very long and busy day.

The pier meeting at Colwyn Bay town hall was extraordinarily well attended, and sadly two hundred or so had to be turned away, because we simply couldn’t accommodate any more.

I’ll blog about it tomorrow, but I’m sure you’ll forgive me if I turn in now.

January 21, 2010

Colwyn Bay pier

A brief housekeeping note:  as many readers will be aware, I have called a meeting at 6.00 pm tomorrow (Friday) to discuss the future of Colwyn Bay pier.

This has generated considerable interest, and other bloggers have been encouraging people to attend.

However, the venue, Colwyn Bay town hall, is quite small and if people do not register their intention to attend, they may find, unfortunately, that they are turned away.

If you do wish to come, you will be very welcome, but please e-mail my office at owenj at  parliament.uk to let us know.  Space is now very limited indeed, so please contact us as soon as possible.

January 20, 2010

The ghost of Gordon Brown

Nothing could underline more vividly the political irrelevance of Gordon Brown than this morning’s economic news.

Inflation has jumped from 1.9 per cent in November to 2.9 in December – the largest rise on record.  Mervyn King has warned that it may rise above 3 per cent, and that the patience of Britons will be “sorely tried”, with stagnant pay levels causing a real-terms decline in living standards.

Meanwhile, Fitch, the credit ratings agency, says that Government plans to halve the deficit in four years are too timid and that it is looking for more positive proposals to cut spending, failing which the UK’s triple-A credit rating will be threatened.

Peter Mandelson understands that there must be deep cuts in expenditure: he has warned that Britain and Europe face a period of “rapid relative economic decline” if governments fail to reduce spending.

Alistair Darling realises that, too: he is to propose spending reductions of around 17 per cent in areas outside health, policing and international aid.

And all the while, Downing Street is haunted by the poor, deluded ghost of a Prime Minister, still gibbering distractedly about “Labour investment” while the real world gets on with real life.

January 19, 2010

Vote for Plaid Orpington

Plaid Cymru leader in the Welsh Assembly, Ieuan Wyn Jones, has attracted considerable ridicule by “pledging to spend an extra £20bn a year on providing a ‘living pension’, as the party focuses on the general election”.

The problem, of course, is that Plaid are not going to win the next general election, unless they have plans of which I am unaware to put forward candidates in seats such as Orpington, York Outer and Glasgow Pollok and seek to persuade voters there that it would be in their interests to vote for a Welsh separatist party.  Even then, it would be a bit of a tall order.

If Mr Wyn Jones had said that in the event of a hung parliament, Plaid Cymru would require an increase in the state pension as a quid pro quo for supporting the governing party, people might have listened to him.

As it stands, however, he has simply made a twit of himself.